azVolFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,467
- Likes
- 751
So one woman accused him of rape. Never told her husband about it. And waited about 20 years later to come out about it.
You believe she was telling the truth....but the twenty women who spoke out about Cosby, they are all liars?
Michelle Hurd coming out and accusing him makes me believe it more than anything. He didn't rape her but showed the same actions that led to him raping the other women.
But, neither Hurd or Hill allege that they were raped. Therefore the other women must have been raped. Logical. It is getting to the point that any woman who had an association with Cosby must have been raped. They don't remember being raped but they must have. Cosby must be the most clever serial criminal in history to commit all these acts and the women don't remember them.
I know you're a math teacher so you must understand logic. 21 accusers doesn't prove anything. Remember? The Crucible?
What kind of evidence do u need to prove that Cosby is a predator?
So, how did you calculate those odds?
There doesn't have to be a set number. It's basic logic. The more people who come forward with the same story, the more likely the story is to be true.
If 30 women accuse you of rape, it's highly unlikely that all 30 are lying. You're really reaching at this point.