Questions (merged)

#104
#104
Stoops
1999 7-5
2000 13-0
2001 11-2
2002 12-2
2003 12-2
2004 12-1
2005 8-4
2006 3-2
TOT 78-18 (81.2%) 1 National Championship, 3 Bix12 titles

Fulmer
1992 4-0
1993 10-2
1994 8-4
1995 11-1
1996 10-2
1997 11-2
1998 13-0
1999 9-3
TOT 67-14 (82.7) 1 National Championship, 2 SEC titles
 
#105
#105
Stoops: 78-18 (.813 winning percentage)

Very impressive... at the end of this season, he will be the winningest active coach in college football who has coached at least 100 games.
 
#106
#106
tclowers23 said:
I can't find the stats, hatvol... I'm looking everywhere.
Click to expand...
Here are the relevant facts: Fulmer in 13 full seasons, has one National Title, 2 Conference Titles, and 3 Major Bowl appearances. Stoops in 7 full seasons, has a National Title, 3 conference titles, and 4 Major Bowl appearances. So, if Stoops quit tomorrow, he would have a better resume than Fulmer in roughly half the time. That's not taking into account that Stoops took over a program that had suffered four straight .500 or below seasons, while Fulmer took over a team that had won at least 9 games and two conference titles in the four year preceding his ascending to the throne.
 
#107
#107
hatvol96 said:
No faster than Fulmer's fell from 2000-2005.
Click to expand...


Well if you compare Stoop's 2005-2006 to Fulmer's 2000-2001 you get Stoops at 11-6 and Fulmer at 19-6. However, in Stoops years as head coach, he would not reach the point in his career to compare to Fulmer's (2000-2005) until next season. However Fulmer won 8-11-8-10-10-5 in those 5 seasons. Looks like a 1 season drop and recovery so far.
 
#108
#108
Fulmer definately cannot compare to the Bryant's, Hayes', and the other of the great coaches in NCAA history.
 
#109
#109
allvol said:
Stoops
1999 7-5
2000 13-0
2001 11-2
2002 12-2
2003 12-2
2004 12-1
2005 8-4
2006 3-2
TOT 78-18 (81.2%) 1 National Championship, 3 Bix12 titles

Fulmer
1992 4-0
1993 10-2
1994 8-4
1995 11-1
1996 10-2
1997 11-2
1998 13-0
1999 9-3
TOT 67-14 (82.7) 1 National Championship, 2 SEC titles
Click to expand...
3-1 in conference championships. Proves my point.
 
#112
#112
hatvol96 said:
Here are the relevant facts: Fulmer in 13 full seasons, has one National Title, 2 Conference Titles, and 3 Major Bowl appearances. Stoops in 7 full seasons, has a National Title, 3 conference titles, and 4 Major Bowl appearances. So, if Stoops quit tomorrow, he would have a better resume than Fulmer in roughly half the time. That's not taking into account that Stoops took over a program that had suffered four straight .500 or below seasons, while Fulmer took over a team that had won at least 9 games and two conference titles in the four year preceding his ascending to the throne.
Click to expand...

Like I said earlier, hatevol, let's see where Stoops is in 13 seasons. You can't compare 7 to 13. I already compared each's first 7+ seasons and they were very comparable.
 
#118
#118
Wow, this arguement could go round and round forever. This thread should be "The Topic That Never Ends III."
 
#120
#120
Volunteer_Kirby said:
I like how he chooses to capitlize every word in the sentence. He's a creative one. ;)
Click to expand...

Just take it easy killer. No worries...

To answer the question... yes, I think Schaeffer wouldn't been better served at UT being a PK holder than a QB at Ole Miss. He'd be able to keep his dignity.
 
#121
#121
I can't believe it lasted this long. When I saw the thread I though "are you serious". I love Fulmer but one of the greatest ever is pretty far out there
 
#124
#124
allvol said:
if ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry christmas
Click to expand...

Well the facts speak for itself. without Cut winning percentage is 15 points less with Cut. Fulmer was nothing without Cut. Fulmer is getting too much credit.

Ole Miss made the biggest mistake in getting rid of cut.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top