RudyVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2022
- Messages
- 854
- Likes
- 1,954
It’s different.
Was the punch to the head an in-game mid-play move?
Driving and drunk driving is not inherently violent. Hockey is. If he was trying to hurt the guy, the only thing that matters is was it “legal” or “illegal” within the rules of hockey. It’s the difference between a “good hit” and a “dirty play”, but it’s still a “play”, not a criminal act. You can’t take the play out of its context to seek justice for the tragedy. You might as well sue the whole league and all its players that have knowingly took part in it.
I feel you that it's different than a guy sucker punching someone because it's mid play. The precedent for someone to be charged for something they did in a sporting event is there though, at least somewhat related to this. Hockey is inherently violent but I've personally never seen someone kick a sharp skate at someones' neck/head intentionally, mid game or not. It probably has happened, just saying it's at least rare. When the sport requires you to wear sharp objects on your feet that can cut someone, I believe it's against the law and rules to use them intentionally to maim someone, mid game or not. I'd equate it to a football or soccer player forcefully stomping a players head with cleats and the player dies. Both could be considered violent sports but that's totally out of context of the play. Sure, he attempted to make it look like an accident, and proving the intent to injure may be difficult. I'm pretty sure this will go in front of a judge to make that call though. So, we'll see.