Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
#45,303
#45,303
BearCat204 said:
It's humbled many great college football minds like Saban and Spurrier.
Click to expand...
Hard to have it all your way when you are dealing with men making millions and it's their lively hood. It's not like when you butter up some kid that came from nothing in many cases, meet their family and feed them a line during recruitment that thinks you're special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hooter vol and BearCat204
#45,304
#45,304
VolNash17 said:
Chadwell would do well at UCLA… he is energetic and strategic at the same time. Good recruiter… would he fit personality wise? Idk… but he’s a damn good football coach. Or he could wait until Mac retires at UNC. That’d be a little more natural fit.
Click to expand...
Chadwell is a better fit at MSST imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoBigOrange86 and TN-POSSUM
#45,307
#45,307
screenthis said:
A fair and specific point. Still, with the right players (Hooker and Hyatt), we'd still be throwing bombs. With Milton? Lot's of runs and passes that are really extensions of the run. I think (hope) you'll see the old schemes coming back with Nico.
Click to expand...
You would think with Miltons arm though we would see more deep 1 on 1 shots on the outside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screenthis
#45,309
#45,309
VolNash17 said:
Chadwell would do well at UCLA… he is energetic and strategic at the same time. Good recruiter… would he fit personality wise? Idk… but he’s a damn good football coach. Or he could wait until Mac retires at UNC. That’d be a little more natural fit.
Click to expand...
Look for Fresno St HC to be near top of list, to replace Kelly...
 
#45,313
#45,313
VolGee4 said:
Wow…talk about stretching my comments. 7 years? Hahaha.

We have seen significant improvement. Facts are facts.

Transfers are great to fill holes; not to overhaul your position groups. You still have to develop.

Once again, no point of discussing if you aren’t going to accept that Heupel had no influence on his first freshman class and that the defense has actually improved. We aren’t competitive? Holy ****, we went 11-2 last year. But, carry on.
Click to expand...
We went 11-2 last year in spite of a trash defense, not because of a good defense.
At some point it becomes about development and scheme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, Smyrna ATL Vol and knoxvol52
#45,320
#45,320
Devo182 said:
Our Pass D is in the top half of the country, even after declining after losing our best db far and away.

It's like you watch games, through expert lenses, and see one of the worst defenses in the country...without watching any other games (objectively)...and yet make conclusive, far-reaching opinions.


As for talent:

1) NCAA cloud over us for 3 years

2) 2021 class hardly exists

3) Reduced scholarships

4) We do have some top talent...it's just now coming in.

5) Despite all of this, our defense has improved EVERY YEAR 😅


And yet KNOWING ALL OF THAT:

NoT gOoD eNoUgH tO tHeSe OlD pRo's EyEs


Or just keep going straight pre-moneyball for all I care and be a common fan in the stands with binoculars and a notepad...they see everything!
Click to expand...
Or you can watch the games and see what a pathetic excuse for defense it is. Or you can win the statistical national championship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volsdeep4, Scvol7906, Memphisvol87 and 2 others
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top