SoilVol
No step on snek
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 9,601
- Likes
- 67,716
Can't follow a rule made in the future.View attachment 616134
So if Spyre actively recruits a player, say Nico, and then we sign that player, Nico, then we in effect have broken the guidelines.
To be clear, I don’t think we did anything wrong. But I’m playing the NCAA argument here based on reporting and their guidelines.
According to my understanding, either that flight didn't happen as described or that was legal AT THE TIMEBut if the group, Spyre in this case, paid Nico to come here prior to him committing, then that’s where we could be in trouble, at least according to this article. So far this one has given the most in-depth information as to what’s going on.
the original story on his contract, states this. There is nothing tied to Tennessee with the contract.Even if Spyre flew Nico on a private jet...that's Spyre and not UT. Nico is also from California and could receive NIL payments...including a flight on a private jet...and it not affect his eligibility with the NCAA. The only potential issue would be him being paid directly to sign with UT, and his NIL agreement with Spyre was for them to have rights to his name, image, and likeness no matter what school he signed with. All legal and all within NCAA rules. The NCAA's argument wouldn't hold up in court...not even for a second.
The article has one quote regarding Tennessee officials. The rest of it is about what is being investigated and why it is being investigated. Whether it was a TN official or an NCAA official saying TN officials are worried isn’t made clear.Even Finebaum said the NCAA leaked the article to the NYT to try to build support for their case. So all the NYT article came directly from the NCAA. Do you trust the NCAA?