Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 616134
So if Spyre actively recruits a player, say Nico, and then we sign that player, Nico, then we in effect have broken the guidelines.

To be clear, I don’t think we did anything wrong. But I’m playing the NCAA argument here based on reporting and their guidelines.
Can't follow a rule made in the future.
 
Who would Tennessee get to replace Heupel?
slapsgiving on Make a GIF
 
But if the group, Spyre in this case, paid Nico to come here prior to him committing, then that’s where we could be in trouble, at least according to this article. So far this one has given the most in-depth information as to what’s going on.
According to my understanding, either that flight didn't happen as described or that was legal AT THE TIME
 
It is quite comical that the NCAA sat and watched a complex and highly coordinated sign-stealing scheme, one of the worst in the sport’s history, that directly impacted results on the field go basically unpunished while choosing to focus their efforts on going after the lawless wasteland that is NIL. These goobers have no business being in a position of power.
 
Even if Spyre flew Nico on a private jet...that's Spyre and not UT. Nico is also from California and could receive NIL payments as a high schooler...including a flight on a private jet...and it not affect his eligibility with the NCAA. The only potential issue would be him being paid directly to sign with UT, and his NIL agreement with Spyre was for them to have rights to his name, image, and likeness no matter what school he signed with. All legal and all within NCAA rules. The NCAA's argument wouldn't hold up in court...not even for a second.
 
Even if Spyre flew Nico on a private jet...that's Spyre and not UT. Nico is also from California and could receive NIL payments...including a flight on a private jet...and it not affect his eligibility with the NCAA. The only potential issue would be him being paid directly to sign with UT, and his NIL agreement with Spyre was for them to have rights to his name, image, and likeness no matter what school he signed with. All legal and all within NCAA rules. The NCAA's argument wouldn't hold up in court...not even for a second.
the original story on his contract, states this. There is nothing tied to Tennessee with the contract.
 
Even Finebaum said the NCAA leaked the article to the NYT to try to build support for their case. So all the NYT article came directly from the NCAA. Do you trust the NCAA?
The article has one quote regarding Tennessee officials. The rest of it is about what is being investigated and why it is being investigated. Whether it was a TN official or an NCAA official saying TN officials are worried isn’t made clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top