SoilVol
No step on snek
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 9,695
- Likes
- 68,355
Yes, this has been in the works for months. UT knew it was coming, assembled a legal team, mobilized support, developed strategy, drafted and redrafted legal docs, got approval up the chain, prepared to execute and did just that. UT warned the NCAA and so did the AG. I wouldn't say the NCAA was exactly blindsided. Underestimated Tennessee and miscalculated consequences-- obviously.
Not factually wrong! Didn’t say they contracted an existing group did I? No.They didn't contract an already existing group. Factually...just wrong.
The member universities, pushed by Teddy Roosevelt, created the NCAA as a governing body. Because they knew they all wanted rules and...someone...has to govern and enforce them.
The universities, via faculty, admin, student-athletes, ADs, etc, vote on all major boards and control it.
That also doesn't mean the body and some universities won't disagree. Like any voting body vs populace (see: congress). That has grown with sketchy NiL guidance.
Will another university-led iteration end up in the same vein? Yes. Moreso it would be more concentrated in the hands of your rivals, not spread out across 300+ D1 schools. Likely an even worse version.
That's to say - the current NCAA sucks and always has. Because it's run by universities and always will be. Maybe it's time for a private organization to run things for the schools. One that actually follows federal laws and basic market understandings. I mean, how LONG was the universities' amatuerism facade clearly illegal according to federal law? Over 100 years...?
Preach! I really hope this is included.I am as well, and they can be sued for arbitrarily and capriciously enforcing their own bylaws and rules, in addition to more anti-trust issues violating the Sherman Act. But, that’s not my area, so I will let those advising Plowman handle it.
Exactly.This is why people who say, "But the NCAA IS the schools" don't tell the full story. There are agendas, and the people in charge have biases. You can't trust the leadership and who is calling the shots because the enforcement is always uneven and outrageous.
I thought the CFP was separate from the NCAA. That's one reason Michigan would have been in the playoff no matter what punishment the NCAA gave them.I didn't read Forde, so I can't comment in that context, but the NCAA's weapons are Lack of Institutional Control and a postseason ban, both of which the NCAA pushed last time. They were forced to back off both when the AG got involved and weren't happy about it. Coming after UT in the probationary window allows them to treat UT as a repeat violator, reopening the door to a LOIC and harsher sanctions, including threatening to keep UT out of the playoffs.