Rishvol
Well-Known Member -StoVol
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 25,591
- Likes
- 57,745
Still missed the point..the point is that successful small-mid market teams are torn apart.Mets spent more than anybody the last few seasonsā¦whereās THEIR run? How many consecutive WS trips for the Yankees are we up to? Now do the Dodgers. NOBODY is doing a ārun of greatnessā. Gameās too humbling.
EXACTLY...I tried in the mid aughts and 2010s to get into the Ray's and went to a lot of games when I lived there...but that right there put a freaking hammer stop on it and I said screw it I ain't getting involved anymore.Yes. I lived in Tampa for a long time. The Tampa Rays have done a great job of handling their small budget. But still, it was not fun watching players play really well and then leave for a higher salary at the big markets. Just not as fun to have big turnover year after year (David Price).
Thank you for understanding and articulating what my biggest issue is.Both things can be true. You are correct about the crazy spending without a plan not regularly leading to dynasty type runs. Imo mostly because of the size of those ownerās eyos lol. It is also true that well run small market/lower revenue teams have a hard time holding onto the talent they shrewdly acquire with a good organizational plan. So the current system doesnāt guarantee the big markets success, but it guarantees that small market teams thaare at a huge disadvantage trying to hold into their players.
The fact that āSUCCESSFUL small mid-market teamsā exists in your post obliterates your āpointā. Teams that scout, develop and manage correctly compete perfectly well. Itās when they go all-in on one or two players and start dumping the farm when they go backwards. Weāre seeing Pittsburgh start to get it and Tampa Bay is another winning model. The Dodgers have always been able to purchase whatever was willing to be bought, but when the Parking Lot Dude owned the team and the process was badā¦so were the results. Do it right and you can win.Still missed the point..the point is that successful small-mid market teams are torn apart.
If you want to say big spenders don't do anything..then ok..but that still doesn't change the fact that small-mid market teams are torn apart...some quicker than others.
You win...leave it.
Completely agree. I generally hate owners moving teams. Still a sin that Seattle doesn't have an NBA team (because the city wouldn't fork over a bunch of public money). So if you're rooting for a team in your city, what are you really rooting for if that team can be ripped away in the middle of the night (Browns)?Go look at when they were good. It's not the fans fault their cheap ass owner stripped the roster so he could move to Vegas.
I hope so..I like the approach we are taking...but it does get really frustrating for obvious reasons.To be fair, we are one of the richer teams.
There are only like 3-4 program that can throw more money around than we do without blowing their whole load.
How many WS have Pittsburgh and Tampa won??The fact that āSUCCESSFUL small mid-market teamsā exists in your post obliterates your āpointā. Teams that scout, develop and manage correctly compete perfectly well. Itās when they go all-in on one or two players and start dumping the farm when they go backwards. Weāre seeing Pittsburgh start to get it and Tampa Bay is another winning model. The Dodgers have always been able to purchase whatever was willing to be bought, but when the Parking Lot Dude owned the team and the process was badā¦so were the results. Do it right and you can win.
Itās not a SYSTEMā¦itās free market. And the Cubs have ONE WORLD SERIES title since their back to back in 1907-1908ā¦thatās a franchise that has historically printed money but also historically mismanaged its assets. Theo Epstein did it for both Boston and Chicago. Put him in charge of Tampa Bay or Pittsburgh and heās got more than enough opportunity to duplicate the feat. Baseball is an equalizer. Giving a player $100 mil doesnāt make them get you that one hit that turns a series around and the manager doesnāt need a HOF lock to win a pennant. Braves lost AcuƱa and made a series of July deadline trades for spare parts that ignited their WS run. Those spare parts cashed in with OTHER franchises after the season and didnāt net any more rings up to this point. Baseball is not as complicated as fans make it out to be.Pittsburgh has won their division ZERO times in the last 30 years. They have finished last in their division 12 times in the past 30 years. Next to last 7 times. If Iām not mistaken they are currently in last place.
Tampa has faired better having been to the playoffs 5 years in a row before now. They are currently in last place. You donāt think if they had more money to spend, as well as they are run as an organization that maybe they couldāve gotten over the hump one of those 5 years?
To be clear, your assertion is that baseballs system doesnāt put the small market teams at a disadvantage compared to the high revenue teams, right?
Again, I ask for a simple clarification. You donāt think low revenue teams are at any disadvantage vs high revenue teams In baseballās CBA?Itās not a SYSTEMā¦itās free market. And the Cubs have ONE WORLD SERIES title since their back to back in 1907-1908ā¦thatās a franchise that has historically printed money but also historically mismanaged its assets. Theo Epstein did it for both Boston and Chicago. Put him in charge of Tampa Bay or Pittsburgh and heās got more than enough opportunity to duplicate the feat. Baseball is an equalizer. Giving a player $100 mil doesnāt make them get you that one hit that turns a series around and the manager doesnāt need a HOF lock to win a pennant. Braves lost AcuƱa and made a series of July deadline trades for spare parts that ignited their WS run. Those spare parts cashed in with OTHER franchises after the season and didnāt net any more rings up to this point. Baseball is not as complicated as fans make it out to be.
I think youāre more emotionally invested in this than I am. You get very defensive when it comes to baseball lolItās not a SYSTEMā¦itās free market. And the Cubs have ONE WORLD SERIES title since theyāre back to back in 1907-1908ā¦thatās a franchise that has historically printed money but also historically mismanaged its assets. Theo Epstein did it for both Boston and Chicago. Put him in charge of Tampa Bay or Pittsburgh and heās got more than enough opportunity to duplicate the feat. Baseball is an equalizer. Giving a player $100 mil doesnāt make them get you that one hit that turns a series around and the manager doesnāt need a HOF lock to win a pennant. Braves lost AcuƱa and made a series of July deadline trades for spare parts that ignited their WS run. Those spare parts cashed in with OTHER franchises after the season and didnāt net any more rings up to this point. Baseball is not as complicated as fans make it out to be.
Strawman. Iām cursed with knowing what Iām talking about. Lot of posts asserting your point with NO investment? And ālolā is an overused cop out. You seriously laughing out loud like a street preacher?I think youāre more emotionally invested in this than I am. You get very defensive when it comes to baseball lol
Again, I ask for a simple clarification. You donāt think low revenue teams are at any disadvantage vs high revenue teams In baseballās CBA?
Lol as in Iām being lighthearted, not as in Iām laughing at butchna. It isnāt a straw man because I think you like baseball to the point you are willing to overlook valid evidence to believe in your opinion.Strawman. Iām cursed with knowing what Iām talking about. Lot of posts asserting your point with NO investment? And ālolā is an overused cop out. You seriously laughing out loud like a street preacher?
Backhanded slap from you. Canāt possibly have a valid point because I love the game.Lol as in Iām being lighthearted, not as in Iām laughing at butchna. It isnāt a straw man because I think you like baseball to the point you are willing to overlook valid evidence to believe in your opinion.
Ok last point and I promise to stop.
2 GMs, both have the same ability to construct a baseball roster. One has a $70m budget the other has $200m. Does one have an advantage over the other?
Stadium and marketing generates an ENVIRONMENT that lands the free agents. Buffalo has better coaching and development, currently and win moreā¦but their stars have been departing regularly. Diggs anyone? Buffalo as a rule doesnāt outspend others in free agency and still winā¦how is that possible?Buffalo isnāt at a disadvantage because Dallas isnāt allowed to spend more than Buffalo. NFL had a pseudo flloor, and a cap. Level playing field