According to the radio today, the UNLV RB has done the same as the UNLV QB. If true, that suggests to me their NIL is really screwed up.
That's three guys counting the guy at USC. It is very surprising that 3 is by far the FEWEST players who have done this since the NCAA passed its new redshirting rule in
2018. It has nothing to do with NIL. The media and NCAA are lying or deliberately misleading you.
Remember ole Saban deliberately burning redshirts of players he thought would transfer? Ole "Joel Osteen Jr" at Clemson actually told the media braggingly that he would deliberately burn a kid's redshirt if he thought he was going to transfer, but there was no need because the player was staying. Oh, how funny! the media reported. There wasn't this big negative media push about it. In fact, most of sports media bragged about how
great the rule was. A lot of players have asked not to play beyond 4 games since 2018.
But now you have a guy who doesn't want his redshirt burned against his will, and the media immediately frames the issue in a way
to stoke maximum outrage before anyone knows the details of what actually happened. And before the day is out, we see that the NCAA is trying use "outrage" about this i
n order to get its power back and restore its tyranny of criminality.
Meanwhile, UNLV has violated NIL rules by having an assistant coach promise NIL, reportedly, and...
crickets. Even worse, UNLV makes the excuse that an assistant coach doling out NIL didn't matter because word would have had to have come illegally from the head coach (!) to the player or agent. Suddenly the NCAA doesn't care.
All the NCAA wants is for people to believe that this issue has not been going on for 6 years, that it is a direct result of NIL, and that the only solution "to save football"
is for the NCAA to seize control of NIL, which is working fine in the free market.
Meanwhile the NCAA is still deliberately covering up for Michigan. They have still not said what was on those Michigan computers and why the FBI was involved.
Finally, if there does turn out to be a problem here of some sort, the market will "bake that in" to future NIL dealings. The gigantic amount that is owed to players for back years is exclusively the NCAA's doing. The NCAA buried their head in the sand about the NIL issue for a decade.