Recruiting Football Talk VIII

#40,731
#40,731
drylo said:
What I am saying is that schools should be free to join up under a governing body (NCAA) to make rules and administer competitions, etc., and those rules should be permitted to include rules restricting compensation of student-athletes, limiting transfers, etc. (aka “restraints of trade”).
Click to expand...
That's illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: therickbol, Orange. and Jimmy Football
#40,733
#40,733
#40,739
#40,739
drylo said:
Integrated athletic departments. The scholastic sports system as we know it. I don’t understand why anyone feels that schools should be subject to this pressure to pay kids to play on their sports teams. These are schools. We should encourage them to fund and operate robust athletic departments that provide opportunities for kids and help develop athletes in sports other than the one that gives everyone CTE (e.g. Olympic sports, women’s sports).

It’s great that a few of these sports generate tons of revenue, because it helps to fund all sorts of other good things.
Click to expand...
Where did you get the idea that football is not continuing to pay for all these sports? It's not true.

Also per
I don’t understand why anyone feels that schools should be subject to this pressure to pay kids to play on their sports teams.
Click to expand...
I'm telling you: check the baseball roster. Huge winner under the new system. So is basketball.

How do you not understand #Everything school? It's our motto. The renaissance is pretty much across the board.
 
#40,740
#40,740
butchna said:
The money they’re haggling over and posturing isn’t endowments and/or tuition funded and it’s DEFINITELY not government state grants. It’s MULTIPLE BILLIONS from broadcast, streaming and marketing. It’s going to be divvied up by the universities which provide the STAGE (arenas and fanbase brand), coaches, ADs and vital support personnel and of course the players. Dartmouth gets a much smaller slice of the pie and continues their Ivy League pursuits. Free market works.
Click to expand...
Yea, not so sure about 'free market works'. If this leads to an even more uneven system with a few powerhouses and a vast majority of second tier teams, that's not a good system. Hopefully, the end result is a competitive landscape across many teams where players largely are committed to a school and not just available to the highest bidder. Mostly, I'm about results and what makes college athletics optimally entertaining for the fans and yes, good for all involved parties. There's a reason over the years that I've become less and less interested in Pro Sports. Players leave at the drop of a hat. Owners could care less about the fans. Owner gets a better deal or taxpayers refuse to fork over millions, and said owner flees to Baltimore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
#40,741
#40,741
SSVol said:
Those seats displaced my parking. Parking that was close enough that my substantially disabled wife could make the journey.

But since voicing concern is apparently considered proselytizing I'll keep my opinions to myself.
Click to expand...
I am the one who said "proselytizing." I apologize. I am sorry for what is happening to you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob
#40,742
#40,742
SSVol said:
I don't begrudge the players making money, but I do hate what this has become. They finally pushed us to the breaking point and we will not be renewing our season tickets...for $8k. Just no.

This is football. Not philanthropy. Not saving lives. Not building hospitals. Not feeding the hungry. Not providing shelter. Football.

The shark has been jumped.
Click to expand...
How many tickets and what seats ? Hope you don't mind me asking. GBO 🍊
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top