Recruiting Football Talk VIII

#43,503
#43,503
De La Cloobs said:
I bet UGA beats Bama if they meet again. Once UGA got out of being rattled and adjusted, Bama didn't do much outside of a few splash plays.

To handle Bama Georgia have us the play style. Don't give up the edge/contain, shutdown Williams, spy Milroe.

Georgia giving up the edge early basically lost them the game.
Click to expand...

Yeah was super helpful to get the full playbook from both teams yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, beneVOLence, BigSteve09 and 10 others
#43,504
#43,504
Glitch said:
Not trying to be a dick, but agnostic organizations have as much or more overhead as religious ones. Seems silly to me, but that is just my opinion.
Click to expand...
I think the point is that giving to overhead of a religious group is the same as giving to the religious group. If a Muslim charity group had 15% overhead going to the Muslims running the charity, a lot of Christians would probably not want to give to it, no matter how effective and well-intended those Muslims are at the actual purpose of the charity. I respect that. Especially if there are tons and tons of options.

But you're right, every group has overhead, so if overhead in general bothers people, drive out to the affected area and start donating directly to individuals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beneVOLence, Volunteer821, drvenner and 2 others
#43,505
#43,505
De La Cloobs said:
I bet UGA beats Bama if they meet again. Once UGA got out of being rattled and adjusted, Bama didn't do much outside of a few splash plays.

To handle Bama Georgia have us the play style. Don't give up the edge/contain, shutdown Williams, spy Milroe.

Georgia giving up the edge early basically lost them the game.
Click to expand...
Eh, Bama gave them the 2nd half as much as UGA took it. The defensive and offensive scheme clearly became conservative. UGA did play better, but I think Bama being too willing to be too conservative was just as much to blame.

They wouldn't come out in a conservative approach in a new game. I think Bama beats them 7 or 8 times out of 10.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Volunteer821 and VolNash17
#43,509
#43,509
tnhunter 10 said:
Buladean is gone. Many ppl in RM are trapped because the bridges are gone. Reminiscent of 98.
Click to expand...
that's what i fear. many fixed income/retirees dependent on home health, and or loved ones. Probably scared to death. If y'all can imagine, home is built on other side, across the creek. I'm sure there are many deceased among the missing.

Rice Creek in Erwin, and communities above and below Hot Springs. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Sad, sad situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob, OrangenSC, Big Orange#1 and 6 others
#43,511
#43,511
jave36 said:
I think the point is that giving to overhead of a religious group is the same as giving to the religious group. If a Muslim charity group had 15% overhead going to the Muslims running the charity, a lot of Christians would probably not want to give to it, no matter how effective and well-intended those Muslims are at the actual purpose of the charity. I respect that. Especially if there are tons and tons of options.

But you're right, every group has overhead, so if overhead in general bothers people, drive out to the affected area and start donating directly to individuals.
Click to expand...
Well put and that makes a lot more sense to me than the way it was presented originally. Hat tip to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangenSC, drvenner and jave36
#43,518
#43,518
jave36 said:
I think the point is that giving to overhead of a religious group is the same as giving to the religious group. If a Muslim charity group had 15% overhead going to the Muslims running the charity, a lot of Christians would probably not want to give to it, no matter how effective and well-intended those Muslims are at the actual purpose of the charity. I respect that. Especially if there are tons and tons of options.

But you're right, every group has overhead, so if overhead in general bothers people, drive out to the affected area and start donating directly to individuals.
Click to expand...
or volunteer, get names, numbers, and emails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmokinBob, Volunteer821, Glitch and 2 others
#43,523
#43,523
De La Cloobs said:
I bet UGA beats Bama if they meet again. Once UGA got out of being rattled and adjusted, Bama didn't do much outside of a few splash plays.

To handle Bama Georgia have us the play style. Don't give up the edge/contain, shutdown Williams, spy Milroe.

Georgia giving up the edge early basically lost them the game.
Click to expand...
You’re kind. Williams is an issue. He went 3/3 on 50/50 passes, and that was Bama’s main threat in the second half. He was well covered on at least 2 of those. Maybe that result regresses to the mean, but I’m not predicting it until UGA stops him.

If nothing else, I’d hope UGA doesn’t go -3 on turnovers in a potential rematch. Two were absolute gifts.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top