SoilVol
No step on snek
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 9,589
- Likes
- 67,618
I see your point and argument, but I actually disagree.Yes. It was a misrepresentation, as my argument was that UT's chances of getting left out are greater with:
1. A loss to a bad Arkie team as opposed to a potential loss to a good Bama team (as preseason versions of 2-losses had us believing).
2. A worse SoS than we imagined before the season, since OU. NCSt, etc have proven to be lesser wins than we expected.
I didn't predict that we would be left out, or even that we have a greater danger compared to any other given teams. JUST THAT OUR CHANCES OF GETTING LEFT OUT WITH 2 WINS LOOK MORE LIKELY THAN BEFORE THE SEASON BEGAN.
So, you asking me about analysis of any other team is irrelevant. The comparison was to:
A: Our chances if the former were true VS
B: Our chances as we stand.
The argument: Our chances of missing are greater, as compared to our chances as we imagined them in the past.
The argument is not: Our chances of getting left out are greater than any other given team.
The funny thing is that, as best I can tell, nearly every vocal poster on this subject has agreed that, yah, the argument in question true. That Arky loss hurt our chances compared to a loss to Bama. Yah. The argument is true. Our SoS isn't what we expected it to be.
And yet those same agreeable posters still want to argue against arguments that haven't been made.
10-2 with losses at home to Bama and at UGA would be worse for us than our current situation.
Yes, losing to Arkansas is not good, but it was a close loss on the road, and we have the win over Bama as our signature win. In the other scenario we'd have 0 quality or ranked wins. In our current situation we have a high quality win that happens to be a tiebreaker. I think that's more important.
Losing at Vandy was bad for Bama, too. That can't be ignored.