Recruiting Football Talk VIII

Running an offense that requires perimeter player speed/twitch and athleticism combined with pace with a bunch of lumbering WRs, a young QB and dogsh*t OL will def limit you.
I remember before the season started (and even early in the season) when many posters here were stating that our WR corp was one of the major strengths of the team. I always felt it was average at best.
 


It shows that we were very competitive. Hopefully this kind of stuff is studied by the CFP but I doubt it

I think Georgia played like they'd been there before. That was clear from start of their comeback.

They are more talented on OL, on its worst day. And more talented on Dline - which isnt saying much as we just arent great there.

Skill wise, their WR's are just better.

Their Refs were also pretty good. Thought they were very aware of what we were doing all game. Couldnt have asked for a better game than how they executed on Sat.
 
I think Georgia played like they'd been there before. That was clear from start of their comeback.

They are more talented on OL, on its worst day. And more talented on Dline - which isnt saying much as we just arent great there.

Skill wise, their WR's are just better.

Their Refs were also pretty good. Thought they were very aware of what we were doing all game. Couldnt have asked for a better game than how they executed on Sat.
Lol. First time I think I've seen anyone suggest we're weak at DL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
I remember before the season started (and even early in the season) when many posters here were stating that our WR corp was one of the major strengths of the team. I always felt it was average at best.
Getting open out wide is difficult. The sideline is a defender and the WR has limited route options. An SEC CB that is determined not to get beat deep is hard to beat deep, no matter how fast the WR is. UGA plays a lot of man or deep zone concepts against UT and forces most passes relatively short—lots of hitches and curls. Longer throws also require protecting the QB longer, and it’s just low percentage to heave it along the sideline.

It looked to me like UGA wanted to defend against the big play and make UT sustain drives by running the ball and taking short passes. Sampson (who is an absolute stud) made UGA pay, but not enough to force a change in the game plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
I’m old enough to remember lots of people saying if somehow we ever get back to winning 9 or 10 games a year and 8 & 4 being worse case scenario we would never bitch about that!

Then you read the last 50 to 75 pages??
You're responding to a post that I made in the Chirstian Gass thread. It was later moved to this thread.
 
I was begging for that to happen last night. 1 or 2 ADs calling out corrupt officials, is not going to cause a change. It has to be every AD of every school getting screwed over. There's too much money invested for the fans and too much time invested for the student athletes, for this to continue. Somebody's got to be "watching the counters" if you know what I mean.
It is bigger than the SEC. The SEC is in the chain of command but they are not the top of the food chain. Tv and the sports book are the real powers in CFB. Where does the SEC get its money? If you think it is from attendance and merchandise you are mistaken, that is just the walking around money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
So what do you all think about this👀



You know what...I typed out a long message about it being a nightmare scenario bc I really don't want to lose to Kiffin but screw that. I'd love that matchup and I want the chance to go and beat.his.azz on their home turf. They'll be favored but that would make a win that much sweeter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
View attachment 698708
Interesting that Ole Miss isn’t on here.
This means if we win out, we are in IMO. Ole Miss is behind us, because their losses are worse than our losses, while the wins are equal. This actually has it right for a change.
 
I remember before the season started (and even early in the season) when many posters here were stating that our WR corp was one of the major strengths of the team. I always felt it was average at best.

I won't make that mistake again. Gave too much credit to Brazzell before he saw the field and didn't realize Matthews would be on the milk carton. Injuries haven't helped but our receivers are mostly average and make good 2nd or 3rd options at wide receiver.
 

VN Store



Back
Top