KB5252
Repeat Forward Progress Victim
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 38,475
- Likes
- 37,874
No to Tee.This is me being a total homer, but this path forward makes more and more sense to me:
HC: Tee Martin
OC: Jim Chaney (mainly because that contract makes him very hard to fire, and he might find himself again without a defensive head coach micro-managing him)
QBs: Anyone with a pulse.
RB: Jay Graham
OL: Tee, Chaney and Phil should be able to come together and make a good hire here.
WR: Find a good recruiter, Tee will have contacts in this area.
TE: Chaney or outside hire.
DC: Ansley (he won't stay so we're looking at outside hire) Kevin Steele will probably be available.
DL: There are a ton of VFL options here. Chief, Brooks, outside hire.
LBs: Probably another outside hire, although Kevin Simon is still on staff.
DBs: Ansley if he stays, otherwise outside hire.
This makes sense to me because, financially, it would save UT from paying buyouts besides Pruitt's. It would also bring stability and be a very seamless transition, something I think the UT AD would prioritize.
I'm not saying I would prefer this route to a "sure thing" like Freeze or Fickell, but I would be more excited about this than trotting Pruitt out there again next season.
If we're writing 5 year blank checks like has been rumored with Pruitt, I'd rather give that opportunity to a VFL and National Championship winner.
Please read what's in bold before you yell at me.
i know. just giving you a hard time.
i think money is a problem.
at least to the extent that you just keep throwing good money after bad, and to foot the bill for this one, it'd likely rely very heavily on donor money...money that i would suspect they aren't necessarily willing to part with....
but, if they made this a priority, and it was presented in terms of what they're going to go get, instead of what they're running off, maybe it changes things.
no idea.
so, yeah. money is an issue....but if they really all got on the same page and wanted the same thing....it'd happen.
they don't have a clue, collectively, what they want....so nothing happens.
Ranking college football's richest, poorest programs
This is from March this year. Money ain’t a problem covid is an excuse not to spend any. Profit of 55 million for a 2018 5-7 record.
Oh well. If there’s anything I’ve learned in these last 20+ years following UT football, especially the last 10, it’s that coaching matters and Chris Weinke sucks at developing talent. Most of this staff sucks. Adios to them all! Fulmer can go too if he doesn’t agree.
I’m tired of supporting a loser program. It’s going to take elite coaching to turn this around, not a top tier QB being coached by losers. We’ve had enough of that nonsense.
This is me being a total homer, but this path forward makes more and more sense to me:
HC: Tee Martin
OC: Jim Chaney (mainly because that contract makes him very hard to fire, and he might find himself again without a defensive head coach micro-managing him)
QBs: Anyone with a pulse.
RB: Jay Graham
OL: Tee, Chaney and Phil should be able to come together and make a good hire here.
WR: Find a good recruiter, Tee will have contacts in this area.
TE: Chaney or outside hire.
DC: Ansley (he won't stay so we're looking at outside hire) Kevin Steele will probably be available.
DL: There are a ton of VFL options here. Chief, Brooks, outside hire.
LBs: Probably another outside hire, although Kevin Simon is still on staff.
DBs: Ansley if he stays, otherwise outside hire.
This makes sense to me because, financially, it would save UT from paying buyouts besides Pruitt's. It would also bring stability and be a very seamless transition, something I think the UT AD would prioritize.
I'm not saying I would prefer this route to a "sure thing" like Freeze or Fickell, but I would be more excited about this than trotting Pruitt out there again next season.
If we're writing 5 year blank checks like has been rumored with Pruitt, I'd rather give that opportunity to a VFL and National Championship winner.
Please read what's in bold before you yell at me.
in the loosest of terms, this sounds right....lol.So, looking back, the AD had surpluses of $10 million + from 2015-2017. I believe that was after running a deficit before Butch because when Hart was there, the university agreed to suspend its payment from the AD for a few years. So, those surpluses paid back some things that needed to be paid. Let's say they could bank $15 million. Then, after firing Butch and maybe Holly, 2018 was a deficit of $6.5 million. Things had to be paid.
In 2019, the surplus was $750k. That's peanuts...half of what Chaney makes. So, even if we have $10-$15 million in the bank, we are going to be down in revenue this year. That bank money will cover some of it, but they expect to lose $40 million. It won't cover it all, so you have to cut expenses. Then, we talk about firing and hiring new coaches.
This was just a quick glance, but I think that's what we are looking at unless donors want to pony up.
This is a message I can get behindOh well. If there’s anything I’ve learned in these last 20+ years following UT football, especially the last 10, it’s that coaching matters and Chris Weinke sucks at developing talent. Most of this staff sucks. Adios to them all! Fulmer can go too if he doesn’t agree.
I’m tired of supporting a loser program. It’s going to take elite coaching to turn this around, not a top tier QB being coached by losers. We’ve had enough of that nonsense.
I don't think UT has an appetite for cleaning house this year. If some coaches don't want to be here, it's a win-win for UT to help them find their way to another school or the NFL, as we have done in the past.
The only thing UT wants less than a coaching search is a public, drawn-out coaching search. The current administration will want a succession plan in place to avoid another public fiasco. With the positive way last year ended and this year started, potential coaching searches at the HC or coordinator levels weren't even on UT's radar. Factor in the pandemic, the financial shortfall, Fulmer standing behind Pruitt and the way Boyd prefers to do business... no cleaning house.
That's just football. Football pays for ALL of the other programs. That's not an AD number.
There was not $55 million to put into the bank at the end of the year.
Tennessee Athletic Department Reports Budget Deficit of Nearly $6.5 Million - WDEF
That's sh
I don't really call it house cleaning. It's just rolling Pruitt down to DC, helping Ansley return to the NFL on his own, bringing in Freeze to replace both Pruitt and also to handle play calling since Cheney will retire. Other than that minor reshuffling we're just backfilling some assistants as they leave like you said. There, we've cleaned house without any public house cleaning. Just a nice neat orderly process and with Pruitt staying even the recruiting flows seamlessly.