He's a redshirt freshman lol. Competing against two veterans.
If this is the mentality now, I don't want to hear anyone getting mad about kids who won't "wait their turn". The expectation to play immediately is clearly there in the fans just as much as it is in the players.
I understand where you're coming from, I just don't think he's anywhere close to reaching his potential. He still needs to mature, physically.From 2010-2018, 63% of 247 Sports Composite 5-star QBs transferred at least once in their career. HB wasn't a composite 5*. But, the miss rate on highly ranked QBs is high. With two coaching staffs passing him over for QBs that haven't exactly excelled, I would say HB is much closer to that 63% than the 37% that don't transfer and presumably work out. Still early in his career, and he may be a serviceable player, but I think it is apparent HB isn't the savior of the program.
Everything Dobbs was good at it early in his career were things that couldn't show up in regular practice - running and making something out of broken plays. Completely different than what HB would excel at. Now, Hooker I could see. His best quality is running, so that won't be seen much in practice. If HB's qualities revolve around passing, he has every opportunity to shine and show off those qualities in practice.If your friend is saying that, are we back to the how we practice is more important than winning games thing? Because, Dobbs...4th team as a freshman...did not practice well...amazing, unorthodox playmaker in college...in the NFL now...
I didn't notice that. I'm not really sure what they expect. I, personally wouldn't like it. Then again, I'm from the era where you ran everywhere you went, always paid attention to the gameplay, always screamed encouragement from the sidelines if you weren't in the game, stayed close to your coach, and never, ever took off your helmet.One thing that hasn't been discussed, and I didn't like, was Hooker was joking around with walk ons the entire game and was put in over HB who was engaged the entire game
There were only a couple things that bothered me with Milton's play and they seemed bigger at the time. I'd take his gameplay against BG and be happy, compared to what we've seen in the past few years.
From missing sight of open receivers, to stringing out runs when they should've been cut up field (run play for a 1st), his field awareness was a little bit off.
Motionless and heels on the ground. It didn't hurt too much against BG, but any decent pass rush would murder him doing that.
Zip. Knowing when to throw sooner, with a little more touch. This might be the hardest thing for him to correct, since it has to do with timing and he's played with a cannon-arm his whole life. Holding the ball that long will eventually piss off the o-line, who have to fight their blocks for twice as long every play.
Indecision & commitment. He seemed to take just a bit too long deciding on throws and when to run. When he did choose to run, it felt like he didn't hit it 100%.
These are things I think all of us saw and it made his play seem worse than it actually was. Also, these things are easily correctable and a couple of them may be things he doesn't usually do anyway.
I also have to think a lot of it can be blamed on rust, scheme inexperience, and learning the new coaches' and players' in-game tendencies.
These things are coachable and not major issues to correct. I think we'll see a huge overall difference from game 1 - 2, just by correcting a few small issues.
tl;dr - Just rehashing what's already been beaten to death, convincing myself everything is A-Ok.
Well he was QB2. Don't see coach deciding to suddenly swap their standings because one guy is having too much fun during a blowout.One thing that hasn't been discussed, and I didn't like, was Hooker was joking around with walk ons the entire game and was put in over HB who was engaged the entire game
Using our past coaches as a standard for evaluating performance in practice is also a suspect method. To your point, I think it's rare for a good coach to be fooled by practice heroes. It did happen twice to us, but that an indictment on our bad coaches, not on how common it is for a player to kill it in practice and suck in games (or vv).I just think that’s the exception and not the rule. The only way a competent coach gets QB3 (who hasn’t practiced as well) out there is when QB1 isn’t doing the job.
I'm not saying he should've switched their standing during the game but I do expect the QB2 to be engaged during the game considering they don't know when/if they'll go inWell he was QB2. Don't see coach deciding to suddenly swap their standings because one guy is having too much fun during a blowout.
Using our past coaches as a standard for evaluating performance in practice is also a suspect method. To your point, I think it's rare for a good coach to be fooled by practice heroes. It did happen twice to us, but that an indictment on our bad coaches, not on how common it is for a player to kill it in practice and suck in games (or vv).