engineerVOL
🇺🇸
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
- Messages
- 34,618
- Likes
- 165,699
I simply point to someone like AT who stayed for another year, got a deal with the cookie company and drove traffic to the business because of the deal. Was good publicity for the business and was a talking point for every commentator covering the game. Thus, a win-win for both sides. Those seem like the deals that local companies would get behind and supportI don't watch Knoxville television. Do local businesses ordinarily use celebrity spokespersons for their advertising up there? In Nashville, all that oxygen is eaten up by Titans, Predators, and country music stars. Even then, I don't see much of it here. Usually, the local businesses here use an owner or family member for their advertising.
You committed on his mom??! You sick pervert!That was the second time I saw that. What is sad is that my first was this morning when I committed on his mom coming to the US for the first time. Just didn't pay attention to the top where it had THANOS on it. LOL I claim COVID effects. lol
I think this is a good idea, but also illustrates some of the challenges of NIL in a program like Tennessee that is known for having too many cooks in the kitchen.Peyton Manning needs to start us up a NIL fund. He markets himself well, just think what he could do for our athletes.
Our fans are old. We lost an entire generation of Tenneseans who now spend their money on Bama, Clemson and other contenders Old fans are invested in the old way of doing things, and that includes both the way they advertise their own businesses and the way that they are influenced to try new businesses. If you're much under 40 years of age, you probably don't have too strong a recollection of the glory years. How many people over 40 are looking at TikTok to see where a college football player tells them they should pick up a pizza on the way home from work? I can tell you now, it's not many. Also, we are not getting the sort of 5* talent that is going to attract significant endorsement deals from national brands like you see with the QB at Bama. We are an NIL desert right now.That's pretty much its purpose. They are making official and regulating what is already known across the board.
Cash-For-Players
Cars-For-Players
Suits(lol)-For-Players
Jobs for family member(s) in/around the program or college town.
These have all been utilized going back to at least the 70's. Now instead of it being under the table and unregulated, everyone can talk about it.
Will it be perfect? No. Will there still be under the table stuff going on? Yeah, probably.
But it fixes more (longstanding) problems than it creates, and it pushes the sport(s) forward more than it sets them back.
For a program like Tennessee, it should/could be monumental and a great equalizer. Like everyone else has said, we better get our ducks in a row and quit looking around to see what everyone else is doing.
Money builds the best facilities.
Money buys the best coaches.
Money buys the best recruits (now officially as well).
The best coaches, players, and resources win big.
Winning big brings more money.
I know that our fans already spend money in droves. We fill the stadium, we buy anything orange, we support the players and coaches. I remember in the 90's/00's we were REALLY spending money. The ingredients are there to be successful and build a system that can prop the program back up, strengthen the program, and solidify success. We can't be the only ones that see this. God I hope we aren't.
I wouldn't apply it to one position group. I would equate it to doing the same thing Texas is reportedly doing, with Peyton as the face of it. Who better to rally Vol contributors than Peyton? But maybe also get other former players involved, like Kamara? And like I said, Peyton has done an incredible job marketing himself, maybe that could help our players.I think this is a good idea, but also illustrates some of the challenges of NIL in a program like Tennessee that is known for having too many cooks in the kitchen.
We already have warring boosters. Let's just say we get multiple key contributors, like a Peyton. He sets up some sort of QB Club and the QBs at Tennessee get x amount of dollars per year, sponsored by Peyton and his organization. That's awesome just typing that, I really hope it happens.
So does Peyton get to choose what QBs we recruit? Does he host some camp and the top 10 QBs show up, Peyton helps eval with our coaches and he gets a say in who gets his money? Does he just raise the NIL money and give it to the program, and the coaches make the call? Peyton just has to be happy to have contributed?
I realize we have Heupel, so I have faith that he and/or Peyton could figure that out. But if you apply this scenario to any other position groups, it could be problematic. "I raised all this money for us to get the best. I wanted a certain player, he was ready to come, the coaches wouldn't offer him or commit to getting him here. Now we lost to Florida again and if that idiot coach would have listened to me, we'd have the kid(s) here that would have won the game."
Like this?@engineerVOL is one of those guys that refuses to check his notifications..ughh.
I think this is a good idea, but also illustrates some of the challenges of NIL in a program like Tennessee that is known for having too many cooks in the kitchen.
We already have warring boosters. Let's just say we get multiple key contributors, like a Peyton. He sets up some sort of QB Club and the QBs at Tennessee get x amount of dollars per year, sponsored by Peyton and his organization. That's awesome just typing that, I really hope it happens.
So does Peyton get to choose what QBs we recruit? Does he host some camp and the top 10 QBs show up, Peyton helps eval with our coaches and he gets a say in who gets his money? Does he just raise the NIL money and give it to the program, and the coaches make the call? Peyton just has to be happy to have contributed?
I realize we have Heupel, so I have faith that he and/or Peyton could figure that out. But if you apply this scenario to any other position groups, it could be problematic. "I raised all this money for us to get the best. I wanted a certain player, he was ready to come, the coaches wouldn't offer him or commit to getting him here. Now we lost to Florida again and if that idiot coach would have listened to me, we'd have the kid(s) here that would have won the game."
Hopefully Peyton would be the voice of reason in that situation and rally the boosters to pay up and let the coaches do their job. But someone has to keep them in check, otherwise there is a lot of potential for "They spent my money on what?!"
We'll probably see other programs go through this because of NIL.
I respectfully disagree across all of your points. While I agree that our diehards are older now, and sexier programs have emerged to capture the attention of Millennials and Gen Z, the path to success and big money is still there. VolTwitter is a thing for a reason, and those people aren't 40 and 50 year olds.Our fans are old. We lost an entire generation of Tenneseans who now spend their money on Bama, Clemson and other contenders Old fans are invested in the old way of doing things, and that includes both the way they advertise their own businesses and the way that they are influenced to try new businesses. If you're much under 40 years of age, you probably don't have too strong a recollection of the glory years. How many people over 40 are looking at TikTok to see where a college football player tells them they should pick up a pizza on the way home from work? I can tell you now, it's not many. Also, we are not getting the sort of 5* talent that is going to attract significant endorsement deals from national brands like you see with the QB at Bama. We are an NIL desert right now.