Jimmy Football
Tug-of-War Silver Medalist - St. Louis 1904
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2009
- Messages
- 15,009
- Likes
- 91,794
The impression I get is that they're looking to make it hurt. UT self-imposed, but it rubs them the wrong way that UT has actually benefited from the malfeasants being outed. I think UT wants to avoid significant across-the-board reductions and the postseason ban, which hasn't been enforced in several years. So far, probation and a hefty fine haven't been enough. I think the cooperation became more adversarial after the Failure to Monitor blindside.
I mean, sucks for us, but I just don’t know from where the NCAA has unearthed this newfound sense of confidence and authority. They’re not respected in the industry the way they were even 10 years ago.
- The power conferences don’t like them and feel like they’re just in the way of the big sports taking on a more professional model.
- The university presidents still believe they’re a net positive, but most of them feel like their old enforcement model is regressive and anti-student athlete.
- Obviously, they’re on thin ice with the courts, and they don’t have a lot of mainstream political backing either.
If they go scorched earth on us and we fight back, they’re going to be on a limb by themselves. This seems riskier for them than us, frankly.