UTProf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,603
- Likes
- 30,104
I understand wanting one governing body to control everything to do with the game of football (and other sports). But exactly what do you hope that the governing body can do to control NIL besides have rules to keep the school and coaches out of it? A limit on the amount? ( Would just go back to paying under the table.) Not allow anything? (Already have a Supreme Court ruling against that.) I’m really curious what others and the NCAA want.
That's all they ever were, except for a tiny 10 year blip when they actually won something. Clemson is a glorified mid-major.IMO no team in the nation stands to lose more than Clemson after these realignments. Being a Non-flagship school they will slowly diminish in a major conference with stiff competition, they may be richer but recruits will not want to play for a 7-5 team. They will be a little like Ole Miss in the SEC and Iowa or Minnesota in the B10
Tom Petty is one of the more overplayed artists ever. I grew up hearing his hits, loved them and now after hearing them 85 million times on the radio and hearing his songs covered at bars by local bands numerous times.Tom Petty was from Gainesville. He died so they claimed him. It honestly feels a little exploitive because they waited until he was dead.
You are correct they cannot limit one's earnings amount (in essence), but they CAN allow how one earns. Ie, they can't accept payments from a terrorist organization, as an extreme example. Just like you or I couldn't. Even moonlighting laws are allowed in many instances. It's a voluntary contract.That has absolutely nothing to do with it. NIL is not inside the NCAA boundaries. Their boundaries should ONLY be what is inside the university and games. The Supreme Court already ruled they can’t control what they make on NIL.
Look at this: Vols Fall Practice #2