Recruiting Forum Football Talk VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's gonna make a boat load of money from these deep pockets that carry the games. The rest is just noise that you work with and around. One has to wonder, though, when you reach a breaking point with the money. You can only ask customers to spend so much money on these streaming services. When folks are struggling to pay for gas and food, entertainment will be one of the least important things you spend money on.
I’m from the era of “watching” UT on the radio - guess when the games are only available on streaming services, I’ll go back to that….

or go to a sports bar!
 
My wants...... Get rid of Mizzu and aTm and add FSU to the West and either VA Tech or West Virginia to the East. Tell Texas and Oklahoma "no thanks, we're full".

#Save the Big 12
I don't disagree, but it's so unlikely that the sec would say "no thanks" to Texas and OU money that it's hardly worth discussing.

Now getting rid of mizzou, I can get behind that. Maybe throw in arky.
 
@Neyland Rising liked a comment of mine last night, so I want back and read on from his "Mehupel" post. People trying to Shiano the hire, Josh Pate was even poking the bear, 😂. Only 3-4 members were being rationale at all. . . @Bassmaster_Vol was ready to burn Neyland, then 2 minutes later talking about how good Heupel may be. @SweetasSoda talking about her excitement over his offense. A couple others trying to use reason to explain why Heupel may be a good hire, but mostly posters were curled up on a fetal position, 😂

It's wild how some of the biggest whiners were members I'd never heard of and never seen since.

It's also wild how much better Heupel has been than ANYONE thought he could be, in all respects. Is he the best hire so far in the 20's?
I went back and looked and I can't find any post of my thoughts on the hire. I'm sure I thought we could have done better since I had barely heard of the guy.
 
That would be pretty cool……
post a swing in the “Golf Thread”

I’ll give critique……I’ll be nice…..can’t say everyone else will be….:D
Ok, I'll go first.

golf-cart.gif


its-a-beaut-its-a-beaut-clark.gif
 
State law says UVA and VT must be in the same conference
This is not true. A bill was introduced in 2003 in an effort to either force UVA to leave the ACC if VT didn't get an invite and/or coax the ACC (and UVA to insist) to invite VT from Big East. The measure never passed because VT got the invite. (Also, there was a clause in that bill that said they could go to different conferences if both schools agreed)

Part of getting that invite was that the Gov or AG convinced UVA to plead on behalf of VT. UVA threatened to leave the ACC if they didn't take VT.

The current Virginia AG said last week that he hopes they don't do something that would hurt the other school. Translation: He doesn't want VT to go to the SEC if UVA doesn't OR if UVA doesn't get a Big10 bid. They can go separate ways if it benefits both of them - but I think everyone wants them to stay together.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top