BigOrangeVols
Not an Insider
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 6,429
- Likes
- 5,806
Watch for bowl season, you'll likely find out how under-valued the talent in the east is. These sorts of wild extrapolations from data, using comparative data with very few common opponents, is not as meaningful as most would want to believe.
Look at the charts I posted earlier. In the SEC the east does have the biggest over achiever (a marginally over-achieving Kentucky) but the biggest under-achiever (a massively under-achieving UGA). Everyone else is performing to talent, just like the west. The problem is that the West and the East aren't similar in talent. The best teams from the west should beat every team in the east, and the worst teams from the east should lose to every team in the west. That distracts from the middle third that are relatively equal (but somehow rarely seem to play each other).
Kentucky isn't but so much overachieving as everyone else is underachieving. You can throw out any charts etc. and watch Georgia, Kentucky, Mizzou, Vandy, and USC play and you will realize they are terrible. Terrible coaches, bad players w the exception of Georgia. They just have terrible coaching, much like ourselves.