Freak, he poisons every thread he posts in, and this crap just spreads from the FF to the RF.
This kind of stuff, where you post sympathy for some impressionable young man who is feeling sorry for himself just encourages said young man to follow through if he is having negative feeling.
God, we not only eat our own we offer them up to other schools and encourage them to go.
And then someone like this Bruin gains some kind of sick internet credibility. It sure is disappointing when you love something to see it sliced up a little at a time.
Like I have said before, it's your site.
But it's also your responsibility.
Hmmm
Seems like you are the one that's questioned his character.....
He brought it on himself by not naming a starter when everyone knew what was going on. Tough spot but he owns this mess
This. If he's jumping the gun now, it screams immaturity. He needs to grow up, which I think he will.
I think more than anything JG is itching to play. He likely thinks he can show us all, including the coaches, something during an actual game that he either can't or hasn't shown in practice.
Once he gets some reps in he may well be happy.
What matters now is how to manage it. If JG transfers and QD gets injured, we're down to a 3* FR who needs to RS. It's counterproductive to make this a big issue. It needs to be handled in-house, not blown up in the media.
I think the whole thing is being blown out of proportion. A backup QB was pouting on the sidelines and a coach said "both qb's will play vs Indiana state" and you are doing the usual. Conjecture/speculation of worst case scenarios.
Oh yea it's bad for championship goals. I just don't blame kids in some cases for being selfish. This is one of those times. Now I hate the loophole that allows him to play next year which encourages a quick choice. I hate that but as long as that is there I don't blame him or anyone else. The Bama qb did it last year
Granting immediate eligibility to transfers who meet specific academic standards is one of the proposals an NCAA working group will ask the powerbrokers of college sports to evaluate this month.
The collection of proposals, "intended to improve the transfer environment for college athletes, coaches and teams in Division I," per the NCAA's release, could lead to a dramatic shift in the rules that govern transfers, albeit in the future.
"The transfer working group has referred to the committee on academics an idea that would allow immediate eligibility for students who meet certain academic benchmarks," said Michelle Hosick, the NCAA's associate director of public and media relations. "What those benchmarks would be, no one knows yet. The decision will be driven by data. The committee on academics meets next in October and will begin discussing the concept. ... It's not going to be voted on in the 2017-18 legislative cycle."
The proposals include increasing the penalties for tampering with a potential transfer, offering full aid to postgraduate transfers throughout their graduate programs and eliminating a school's power to control a transfer's list of desired destinations.
School presidents, faculty, coaches and athletic directors will receive a survey about the proposals generated by the Division I transfer working group, which meets in October, this week. The deadline to respond is Sept. 22.
The proposal to offer transfers "one-time" immediate eligibility if they meet academic benchmarks will next go to the committee on academics.
It's important to note, the bulk of the proposals will not become new NCAA rules in the near future. The discussion, evaluation and legislation process is lengthy at the Division I level.
I don't disagree but this thinking leads to two questions.
1) do you believe that JG was recruited with any bit of thinking that he might be 4 years from starting?
2) do you believe he would have signed with Tenn knowing he would have to wait 4 years to start?
Imo there is no chance either of those would be a yes and for that reason amongst others I don't blame he for leaving if he does
Number one is wrong. It would be three years , not two. And he'd have two years of eligibility left. Doesn't really matter what was said in recruitment time. It is always an earn your spot scenario. If he can't beat out Dormady then he needs to work harder. That will be the case wherever he goes.
JG is only one year behind QD-- 2016 vs. 2015. QD only sat two years behind Dobbs. If QD is named the starter, JG will be looking at sitting three years. Both QBs expected to win the competition to start-- and both could start elsewhere. It was always setting up to be a volatile situation.
Point is I wouldn't blame him for leaving. No one should
I would question his decision, based on what I know. That is far from knowing everything, but if he leaves because they told him he would get in a game and then did not, I would have to question whether he wanted to be here in the first place.
Leadership=character in my book but If it makes your feel better you questioned his leadership.
JG is only one year behind QD-- 2016 vs. 2015. QD only sat two years behind Dobbs. If QD is named the starter, JG will be looking at sitting three years. Both QBs expected to win the competition to start-- and both could start elsewhere. It was always setting up to be a volatile situation.