Darth_Shiveman
Probably Being Facetious
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 11,981
- Likes
- 9,727
Great argument against foxholes there 😂
But seriously, there are lots of examples of nonbelievers on battlefields. Pat Tillman off the top of my head. Ted Williams too. Those are just the famous ones.
lol timeline there is off there though. The first of the great pyramids would've been there for at least a couple hundred years by the time Joseph showed up.
Crazy to think about.
When the rounds are exploding and the bullets are whipping by, I'll bet even your examples prayed to somebody. I haven't personally experienced, God be praised but I have seen and heard the explosions. I wouldn't have wanted to be any closer than I was.
Great argument against foxholes there 😂
But seriously, there are lots of examples of nonbelievers on battlefields. Pat Tillman off the top of my head. Ted Williams too. Those are just the famous ones.
It's still slaves though. Every monument in Egypt was built by slaves. The designers were Egyptian (which is what I think you mean) but it was built by slaves
Two problems here:
1. There's not really a consensus among historians or archaeologists that the workers who built the pyramids were slaves, per se. There's some evidence of farmers and the like being employed seasonally for public works in ancient Egypt since farming in the Nile River Vallery was highly seasonally work.
2. Even if they did just use slave labor, there are some engineering feats we have NO idea how they managed. Things like getting some of the huge stones towards the top of the pyramid still puzzle engineers.
I'm probably getting the numbers a little wrong here, but I saw one model where they calculated that to build a ramp that sloped gently enough to get such a massive stone up that high (using the man/animal power available at the time), they would have had to make an earthen ramp miles long and displace tones and tones of dirt to do it. It doesn't seem all that feasible.
Some engineers have created some models that show how it could have bean possible that they used an intricate system of canals and waterways to move them there with much, much less manpower, but there's no hard evidence that this was actually done.
It's not all that crazy to think if we brought together some of the best engineers on earth today, gave them only the tools available to the ancient Egyptians, and told them to build another great pyramid, that they would struggle mightily. And those are guys who have roughly 4,000 years of accumulated knowledge on their side.
Obviously Horus was throwing some sand up that looked like the pyramids and Geb was like oh hey yeah that's what's up then the pyramids solidified. Then Sehkmet was like oh hey no not my litter box and shaped the Sphinx (the pharaoh crown to honor Ra) and Geb was like yeah whatever I guess I'll solidify that too. Then every god made sand castles of themselves which got solidified by Geb.
He was also a career scientist and he used his writing as a way to vent because of the corruption of science. For the record I respect you for being a scientist (I'm getting my teachers license in biology) but one thing I was told by multiple professors is they hate odd numbers. They said it feels like they're "cheating" or "being lazy" (their words) so every time I see "95%" or "97%" I think that survey is made up.
Bless you for going into chemistry (I hate it with a passion) and that's one thing I have to tell people regularly. Not only do you have to read the article but you have to research the author (to see if the have an agenda) and you have to research whoever paid for the research. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is an excellent real life example of science corruption (without her we don't have many of the medicines we have today)Oh I completely agree that science is not 100% right. And I never felt like I was being disrespected by you or anyone. It just caught my attention and so I decided to ask and talk about it. It is not my intention to disrespect you as well. And also, I respect you for desiring to teach the subject. Is it right to assume you will be teaching grade level biology?
I am getting ready to obtain my graduate degree in chemistry at UTK and have performed years of research which included countless scientific articles being read (mostly in chemistry). I have learned a lot about the corruption in todays science. If there is one thing I could tell people now a days about any scientific research is for people to not just go out there and accept everything they are told as fact. There is sooooo much "science" being shoved out there that gets taken as fact by the public that I am sure is complete and total crap. Why? Because scientist want money and the only way to obtain money is to obtain results. And a lot of scientists, not all because there are actual scientists who care about truth, are willing to fudge results to make the science say what they want it to say in order to obtain money.
Bless you for going into chemistry (I hate it with a passion) and that's one thing I have to tell people regularly. Not only do you have to read the article but you have to research the author (to see if the have an agenda) and you have to research whoever paid for the research. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is an excellent real life example of science corruption (without her we don't have many of the medicines we have today)
My wife absolutely loves that show. I always figured it was some sappy romance show. Then she talked me into watching an episode and I was hooked. Lots of action and if u pay attention u may actually learn something, too.
You should read the books. Or better yet, get the audio book. The lady that reads them does amazing Scottish accents. She really makes the book come alive.
Believe it or not, I prefer reading books over audio books. I"m sure that's I shock considering my posts. In fact, I just finished reading the Storm of Swords of George RR Martin's Song of Ice and Fire series(aka the Game of Thrones series) for the 2nd time. I will check them out. Do u know the name of the author?
Believe it or not, I prefer reading books over audio books. I"m sure that's I shock considering my posts. In fact, I just finished reading the Storm of Swords of George RR Martin's Song of Ice and Fire series(aka the Game of Thrones series) for the 2nd time. I will check them out. Do u know the name of the author?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Rudolph
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_Springs_Planned_Parenthood_shooting
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-balaka
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Kony
Not arguing Islamic terror isn't more common nowadays or that their holy texts aren't more conducive to nurturing the type of extremism that leads to terror.
Just saying there are plenty of Christian nutcases too. There are Buddhist ones too. And Hindu ones. And Shinto ones. The dude who shot up a summer camp in Norway a few years ago was a radical right wing nutter who described himself religiously as an "Odinist." Fundamentalism is dangerous regardless of what religion it's coming from.
Edit: And FTR, McVeigh is the most successful domestic terrorist in our country's history. That's not exactly insignificant.
Well I could never go teach in a public school. I'd probably go nuts because of the kids lol so thank you for wanting and willing to do that. We need good teachers of science like you in our schools. And yep, exactly. I do that as well with all of my friends. It can be tedious, but knowing the truth is 1000% better than believing and fighting for a lie.