C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 27,079
- Likes
- 48,374
This is a comparison of homicide rates between Australia and the US. Note that the US figures were happening while firearm ownership and right to carry have been increasing. (Not trying to make a causation argument with that, just stating the fact to be considered when looking at the data) Just throwing it out there.
View attachment 418670
View attachment 418671
Not at all.No, they would have to hold up signs supporting school shootings for there to be an equivalence.
Most states would agree with what you said. I believe the murder of a pregnant woman in most states is considered double murderSeparate DNA, separate heartbeat, separate body, that’s a hard argument to make that it’s not killing another human.
If you stop the heart of a fetus, you’ve not taken the life of another human?
H. Rept. 107-42 - UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT OF 2001Most states would agree with what you said. I believe the murder of a pregnant woman in most states is considered double murder
Ask luther about where he expects them to end up. I am against their law so his whole premise is wasted on me.That seems to have very little to do with Australia's gun deaths figures.
Do you expect them to reduce to 0? Where would be an appropriate number to bottom out?
The fetus is dependent on the host for survival.What makes that so? How is it not a separate life in your opinion? It does have separate dna? A separate heartbeat? A separate body?
Most people who end up killing themselves have a failed attempt in their past. So it's going to be an appreciative number that will carry over from guns.It turns out the large majority of Australia's gun deaths are suicides, and as Luther pointed out, gun suicides are far more successful than other methods, so when you prevent 200-300 gun suicides per year in Australia, only a fraction of those people are going to find a successful way to kill themselves.
Guns in Australia — Firearms, gun law and gun control
The fetus is dependent on the host for survival.
I do not believe a zygote is a human. I do not believe a sperm cell is half a human.
I do not believe an egg is half a human.
All of those things are necessary components in the creation and development of a human.
Let's not have a gun debate and an abortion debate in the same thread.
Anti-gun people look upon gun nuts, as pro-lifers look upon those who support a woman's right to choose.
"They're crazy and have a complete disregard for human life".
Both positions are equally absurd.
Not at all.
Supporting abortion in no way means you support killing babies. NOT AT ALL. NOT ONE BIT.
Some nuts may think it means the same thing, but they are nuts.
Supporting gun ownership in no way means you support school shootings. NOT AT ALL. NOT ONE BIT.
Some nuts may think it means the same thing, but they are nuts.
Only to be used as the mirror image of the nutty gun photo.Your stances are just simply absurd. Being dependent upon a host doesn’t negate it being killed. There’s plenty of animals/bacteria/etc that are dependent upon other things. You can still kill those things.
When does it become a human? And you brought this up, not me