PKT_VOL
Veni, Vidi, Vici
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2009
- Messages
- 17,396
- Likes
- 9,705
I think that's what he wanted to do, if I may play along for a minute. Romney was likely to support a budget that was very similar, if not the same as the Ryan plan. Why not have the guy who came up with the budget on the ticket to defend it? Plus, as I've said earlier, it gives the Romney ticket something the base can sink their teeth into.
The problem is it touches two of the big three third-rails in politics; in a big way. You don't want to attach yourself to a ridge policy outlook like this when you are already down in the polls. It will leave Romney very vulnerable to unsympathetic angle that Obama is already playing to a T.
Romney already cannot connect to the middle class. Obama can. Romney was a CEO of a multi-million dollar corporation which was involved in layoffs and shipping jobs overseas. CEO are some of the most mistrusted and hated people in our society at the moment. So is outsourcing. *It doesn't matter that those are necessary evils or that Romney's company saved a bunch of jobs, only perception matters in the American electorate*
Now throw Ryan on top of that. He wants to dramatically alter Social Security and Medicare. Terrible thing to campaign on when your down already due to character assassination. It doesn't matter if both are necessary for the programs to be viable and sustainable over the long-haul. It is the perception that they are going to war with the middle class and elderly. Those are ideas that you float around AFTER the general election. Not before.