lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,701
- Likes
- 42,913
The countless years investigating the Benghazi saga and some are still sticking to the same old tripe. The who knew what when should still be subjected to congressional oversight with this incident. Maybe not 7 + partisan investigations.I used to think the same. @Mick and I discussed it one time and he provided good sources that the embassy was part of a covert gun running operation. We still failed them on security but the "embassy" may not have been as clean as we once thought.
There's certainly more grey than black and white with the event for me now compared to when it happened.
It isn't confirmed at all. In fact, all of the deaths in 2019 and 2020 are being investigated for a link.For all of those trying to "de-bunk" this story:
Russian bounties to Taliban-linked militants resulted in deaths of U.S. troops, according to intelligence assessments
I don't necessarily disagree that Bill Clinton tried to work with both sides of the aisle, but he lost me when he couldn't control his own damn sexual urges while in the White House. And then lying about it. My biggest disappointments with Bill Clinton were mostly how he conducted himself personally, and the fact he's married to a horrible woman.You may not like this point but I am going to make it anyway. From a few posts that I have read of yours you seem to want logical discussion. I think Clinton is recent but maybe I am too old or nostalgic.
I think an argument can be made that he was the last president to work well with the other side if the isle. He had Newt Gingrich as speaker while balancing the budget, reformed welfare, signed DOMA into law and avoided a full impeachment. These are not necessarily liberal ideas but he had to work with both parties. As for party agenda, yeah, presidents gotta put that as pretty much top priority. If not then they don't get re-elected or even belong to the party. (Not that it's a positive issue.)
Fire away.
Even if it was part of some covert cover up, who was in charge of it? Who was supposed to protect the ambassador, and why were his requests for more security ignored? Why wasn't an American response team sent immediately? Why was it that locals had to dig a still alive at the time ambassador from the rubble instead of a response team? Why was the first response from the administration a lie?I used to think the same. @Mick and I discussed it one time and he provided good sources that the embassy was part of a covert gun running operation. We still failed them on security but the "embassy" may not have been as clean as we once thought.
There's certainly more grey than black and white with the event for me now compared to when it happened.
I am quite sure that his family doesn't want his name used as political fodder. However I am pretty sure that security (money) of the consulates falls to Congress. How many more investigations do you want to see happen? What's a sufficient number for you to be satisfied?Even if it was part of some covert cover up, who was in charge of it? Who was supposed to protect the ambassador, and why were his requests for more security ignored? Why wasn't an American response team sent immediately? Why was it that locals had to dig a still alive at the time ambassador from the rubble instead of a response team? Why was the first response from the administration a lie?
There were plenty of questions to be asked about Benghazi, and many I do not believe were ever fully addressed. So I don't see why the left continues to bellyache that it was "unfair". The family of Chris Stevens deserved some answers.
Even if it was part of some covert cover up, who was in charge of it? Who was supposed to protect the ambassador, and why were his requests for more security ignored? Why wasn't an American response team sent immediately? Why was it that locals had to dig a still alive at the time ambassador from the rubble instead of a response team? Why was the first response from the administration a lie?
There were plenty of questions to be asked about Benghazi, and many I do not believe were ever fully addressed. So I don't see why the left continues to bellyache that it was "unfair". The family of Chris Stevens deserved some answers.
Defense of the consulate/request for more security would have been handled by the State Department.I am quite sure that his family doesn't want his name used as political fodder. However I am pretty sure that security (money) of the consulates falls to Congress. How many more investigations do you want to see happen? What's a sufficient number for you to be satisfied?
I have asked questions about these Russian bounty allegations. Right now, we need more information because what we're being told does not add up.Now if you could just find it in yourself to ask the same questions about the Russian Bounty on American troops, that would be great.
As for Stevens family, they seem to have a better grasp of things than you.
Dr. Anne Stevens, the sister of Ambassador Chris Stevens, has served as a family spokesperson since his death. She is the chief of pediatric rheumatology at Seattle Children’s Hospital. We spoke twice in the past three days, including shortly after the House Select Committee report was issued. Dr. Stevens recalled that her brother had been fascinated by the Middle East since childhood, when he dressed up as Lawrence of Arabia, with a towel and a pot atop his head. He served in the Peace Corps, in Morocco, before joining the Foreign Service, and he served twice in Libya before his final posting there, as well as in Damascus, Cairo, Jerusalem, and Riyadh. My interview with Dr. Stevens has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Whom do you fault for the lack of security that resulted in the death of your brother, in Benghazi?
It is clear, in hindsight, that the facility was not sufficiently protected by the State Department and the Defense Department. But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted.
I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta. They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself.
Chris Stevens’s Family: Don’t Blame Hillary Clinton for Benghazi
Pentagon taps retirement, Afghan funding to pay $1.5 billion for wallDefense of the consulate/request for more security would have been handled by the State Department.
That request is sent to Congress. Congress appropriates the money. If the money is denied, which it was, the State Department has to make due with what they have. That consulate was not the only one where security was/is lacking.Defense of the consulate/request for more security would have been handled by the State Department.