FLVOL_79
GS-16 Classified
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 47,314
- Likes
- 70,072
We tracked thermal tracks from the few Taliban tanks they had operating during Enduring Freedom. Made it easy to see which tanks worked and which ones we could ignore and bomb.They seem to leave a lot of tracks where ever they go. The British Intelligence were able to literally trace their chemical tracks to the airport gate which is wild.
It’s basically impossible to believe he wasn’t briefed.I realize that some of you wont trust the source, but this may explain why President Donald Trump wasn't briefed on intelligence reports concerning bounties being paid by Russia to the Taliban...
Per CNN:
Senior US officials say hundreds of phone calls between Trump and foreign leaders revealed him to be a danger to national security.
Yep. Solid reporting and sourcing.I realize that some of you wont trust the source, but this may explain why President Donald Trump wasn't briefed on intelligence reports concerning bounties being paid by Russia to the Taliban...
Per CNN:
Senior US officials say hundreds of phone calls between Trump and foreign leaders revealed him to be a danger to national security.
That's a crock.Not if you know how the intelligence business operates..so I'm not shocked that so many democrats don't understand..
Whether or not it actually happened, could be another issue, but that is not what these reports concern. The three relevant questions are: (1) Have U.S. officials collected intelligence that Russian operatives were offering bounties to members of the Taliban to kill members of coalition forces? And if so, (2) was this intelligence passed on to the President? (3) And if not, why?As reported today, did it occur to our VN leftists that an alleged Russian bounty on U.S. troops might be an unverified rumor?
Evidently not.
Why would you think it's just rumors? Russia has been supplying the Taliban with weapons for years; but no way in hell they're giving them money, right?As reported today, did it occur to our VN leftists that an alleged Russian bounty on U.S. troops might be an unverified rumor?
Evidently not.
Whether or not it actually happened, could be another issue, but that is not what these reports concern. The three relevant questions are: (1) Have U.S. officials collected intelligence that Russian operatives were offering bounties to members of the Taliban to kill members of coalition forces? And if so, (2) was this intelligence passed on to the President? (3) And if not, why?
That’s why i don’t get all the outrage. This should not be surprising to people if youve paid attention since just about most of us have been alive.Why would you think it's just rumors? Russia has been supplying the Taliban with weapons for years; but no way in hell they're giving them money, right?
Is Russia arming the Afghan Taliban?
It will be impossible to ever prove that any U.S. service members were killed as a direct result of a bounty being paid by Russia. How would you prove such a thing? The really damning thing here is that Trump didn't know about this intel after 3 months. On some level, this has to be embarrassing for the administration.Why would you think it's just rumors? Russia has been supplying the Taliban with weapons for years; but no way in hell they're giving them money, right?
Is Russia arming the Afghan Taliban?
The surprising thing is why the Administration kept it from congress and the public for so long. I take that back, it's not at all surprising. It would've made Trump look weak against Russian Aggression's. It's also telling why there hasn't been a response.That’s why i don’t get all the outrage. This should not be surprising to people if youve paid attention since just about most of us have been alive.
Actually paying bounties to specifically kill U.S. service members seems like an escalation of hostilities to me. I will defer on this to our resident experts, however.That’s why i don’t get all the outrage. This should not be surprising to people if youve paid attention since just about most of us have been alive.
As opposed to supplying Stingers and funneling weapons through Pakistan? Yes that was 35+ years ago, but their mindset is not much different on their end.Actually paying bounties to specifically kill U.S. service members seems like an escalation of hostilities to me. I will defer on this to our resident experts, however.