The exact same could be said of you...
We've used very limited means in our fight vs ISIS, way before the Russians got involved, and this isn't even debatable. We "bombed" sand for a year prior to the Russians coming in and ISIS got stronger. Exlain that...
Putin said Russia respects the regional interests of other nations, but warned the atrocity committed by Turkey would not go without an answer.
two things. One, how many times have i read your articles and gone on to break them down? including checking their "sources" which are usually references back to the initial article author. Two, myself and others have been breaking down why it doesn't work as an air campaign by itself. We have been saying this since we got involved. its not some fresh line off the presses. Russia is "doing better" because they are working with the Syrians and level city blocks to take down a building.
as to explaining why we aren't as "effective" as the Russians again two things. 1. We don't really have a relationship with Syria so we aren't going to hit targets anywhere near Syrian forces or populated areas. Collateral damage and avoid situations of them shooting down our planes. 2. Unless something drastically changed we were focusing on Iraq, and imo never should have been in Syria. And if you want results just look at how the Kurds are doing. In both countries. If we are working with anyone in that area its the Kurds, and they have at least stabilized their regions. again air and ground forces working together is more effective than just bombing. If you look at the maps that break down the bombing locations and look at those regions they are relatively stable.
but please continue to ignore a little bit of logic and reason and post the next conspiracy theory you have.
The only theories being floated around are the ones where you continue to make excuses for our agenda. Its okay to admit that we are only over there to oust Assad and not slow down ISIS.
omfg, you can't be consistent. How is us staying the frick away from Syrian forces actively trying to get rid of him? I agree that we wouldn't shed one tear if Assad fell, and we aren't protecting him and his. but our active participation in the region has only been targeted at ISIS. And again look at Korbane and the Kurdish areas and tell me we aren't slowing down ISIS.
Who is "we"? Unless you're part of Russia, whatever country you reside in isn't doing s***. Even China is entering the war to help Russia. Obama is a coward liberal. Like all liberals in America.
Fighting ISIS at its source, for the West, means putting the blade to its own throat. It is clearly responsible for the rise and perpetuation of this terrorist group not through the mere consequences of its actions, but through an intentional, concerted effort to create a formidable proxy army to wage its wars in the Middle East and North Africa with.
If Westerners are wondering why, despite attacks on Western soil, and alleged military campaigns predicated on these provocations setting out to eradicate ISIS, the terrorist organization not only still survives, but is thriving, the answer is the West has no intention of eradicating it.
Putin: Downing of Russian jet over Syria stab in the back by terrorist accomplices https://www.rt.com/news/323262-putin-downing-plane-syria/
I'd agree. If he couldn't end it quick, it wasn't going to happen..
I don't think Putin should be underestimated though. I doubt this disappears without a response..
I'd agree. If he couldn't end it quick, it wasn't going to happen..
I don't think Putin should be underestimated though. I doubt this disappears without a response..
What's he going to do, attack Turkey? No! Maybe shoot down a Turkish plane at the most.
Russia cannot afford a protracted fight far from it's borders. It dam sure cannot afford a fight with NATO.
(MUST WATCH) Russian Pilot WAS EXECUTED by Turkish While Parachuting from bomber!! ? Dc Gazette
These people are just savages...