FEARinSEC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,591
- Likes
- 630
They did out recruit us the last two years if you count everyone whose left from that 2012 class.
They are definitely better than us at DB, QB, and WR. And they were also playing with their first team qb, and best wr. That normally helps a lot. The only position we were def better was oline.
Either way, even great coaches occasionally drop one they shouldn't. Do you think Louisiana Monroe had more talent than Alabama in Saban's first season?
They did out recruit us the last two years if you count everyone whose left from that 2012 class.
They are definitely better than us at DB, QB, and WR. And they were also playing with their first team qb, and best wr. That normally helps a lot. The only position we were def better was oline.
Either way, even great coaches occasionally drop one they shouldn't. Do you think Louisiana Monroe had more talent than Alabama in Saban's first season?
I had Dools on a shorter leash because his resume did nothing to give me hope that he could get the job done. At least Butch's resume has some success tied to it so I am Giving him more than 12 games to turn it around. Besides, my criticisms of Dooley are logical unlike OregonVol's criticisms of Butch which are completely void of historical context or reality.
Every time I try to make a good point to myself about this coaching staff I keep saying to myself:
They lost to Vandy at home after a Bye Week in a must-win scenario.
They lost 4 games by a combined 140 points.
We lost to an inarguably inferior team and were totally outclassed by better teams. In the history of any coach I've ever been able to find... some would get blown out in their first year but no successful coach I could find was consistently blown out like this staff has been.
I get we had a difficult schedule.
I get we had talent issues.
We should have still been able to cobble something together and at least cut those 4 games to a combined 70 points. That's still 17.5/game loss gap. I'd have, sadly enough, been fine with that.
...says the guy who thinks the first year of a coach doesn't give any clues as to whether he will be successful or not (even though only 2 of the last 23 SEC Championships were won by guys who had a losing record their first year at their schools).
Every time I try to make a good point to myself about this coaching staff I keep saying to myself:
They lost to Vandy at home after a Bye Week in a must-win scenario.
They lost 4 games by a combined 140 points.
We lost to an inarguably inferior team and were totally outclassed by better teams. In the history of any coach I've ever been able to find... some would get blown out in their first year but no successful coach I could find was consistently blown out like this staff has been.
I get we had a difficult schedule.
I get we had talent issues.
We should have still been able to cobble something together and at least cut those 4 games to a combined 70 points. That's still 17.5/game loss gap. I'd have, sadly enough, been fine with that.
Jones spotted UF the first half and got back in the game with Worley BEFORE Worley started getting his act together.
If you will remember, Driskell went down. You lost several DB's and an OL in the game. But Jancek managed to make Murphy look like Cam Newton.
UT had a 7 win roster. Not a 9 win roster... not an SECE champ roster... a 7 win roster if they had above avg coaching. An average coaching job gets them six.
They didn't get it done. Jones may eventually make all of us forget Saban, Meyer, The Bear, and Neyland... but the first season was an underachievement.
Bama also lost every game by a combined 36 points.
UT lost multiple games by more than that figure this year alone.
It was obvious, LA-Monroe loss or not, that Bama had a capable staff. Saban had an established track record of success in the SEC. Jones' staff, after the USCe game, looked completely lost and totally outmatched.
Yeah, that's pretty much how I feel too. I'd love to be able to convince myself this season was just a bump in the road or just be able to bury my head in the sand, but it is hard to find historical context (or at least recent historical context, I don't tend to count stuff that happened 25+ years ago when the game, money, competition, and recruiting were so completely different) for a coach just getting blown out repeatedly and losing to inferior opponents in meaningful rivalry games ultimately turning things around and really succeeding long term. It's like searching for a needle in a haystack.
What clues about Saban did you pick up after his first year at Bama that included a loss at home to Louisiana Monroe?
Yep... that's the number of departing Vol football players this analyst says could be drafted:
NFL draft analyst: 6-10 Vols could be drafted in 2014 | Nooga.com
So that begs the question... how can a team with "no talent" or insufficient talent to beat Vandy put that many guys in the NFL?
Interesting quote to say the least: "Its amazing that a team not bowl-eligible has this many potential draftees, but Tennessee could easily have 6-10 draft picks, he said.
Since Dooley couldn't recruit, how could this be? Will there be others in the next couple of years?Yep... that's the number of departing Vol football players this analyst says could be drafted:
NFL draft analyst: 6-10 Vols could be drafted in 2014 | Nooga.com
So that begs the question... how can a team with "no talent" or insufficient talent to beat Vandy put that many guys in the NFL?
Interesting quote to say the least: "Its amazing that a team not bowl-eligible has this many potential draftees, but Tennessee could easily have 6-10 draft picks, he said.
I defended the proposition that Fulmer should get his chance to turn the ship around. I, like so many here are doing, argued that we should avoid discussin negatives until it was time to act. I then did the same with Dooley.
I didn't "defend" either of them... just the idea that you hold judgment until it was time to make a final judgment.
I was wrong.
The balance of judgment is being loaded from the moment a coach says "I do". Jones has done some super things that are very easy to defend or praise. But the on field performance of his players and coaches in year one left much to be desired... and yes even for a team with a 1st year coach.
Huh? Meyer beat UT in his first year as well and finished 9-3. Zook went 7-4 the year before.