Skyler McBee

#226
#226
Spartacavolus said:
28% from 3land will put the same amount of points on the scoreboard as 42% from 2 pt shots.

You were close.
Click to expand...

lets use your theory:

golden would be 52%
jordan mcrae 54%
cameron tatum 53%
renaldo woolridge 60%

clearly these 3 guys should start and take 10 3's minimum each. that is what your theory says right?
 
#228
#228
bleedingTNorange said:
Haha so guys shooting 28% you tell to fire away? No wonder you're no longer a coach. What a dumbA statement.

So trae josh and cam should just stand behind the line and fire away by your theory? They all shoot better than 28%.
Click to expand...


Look dumbass, enough of your drama and bad comprehension. All I did was give you the math conversion since you don't understand it. You can continue to make little sarcastic sidebars further showing your ignorance, which has been exposed today. It's fine with me. You can't freaking read, so you create your own drama. Your synapse aren't firing right kid. I said nothing about "telling a guy 28% to keep firing away". Said nothing about 28% being good, and said nothing about 42% being good.

Learn the game. And learn to read.
 
#230
#230
NEVolFan said:
I would enjoy watching UT play 1 game with all 3 point shots...could hang in there easily if they could hit in the 25% range.
Click to expand...

see kentucky previously...lol. We lose by 40 if the 3 ball didnt go down. That was one of the most frustrating offensive games ive seen. Anytime we went into the paint (minus maymon) kentucky had a party
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#231
#231
Spartacavolus said:
28% from 3land will put the same amount of points on the scoreboard as 42% from 2 pt shots.

You were close.
Click to expand...

Spartacavolus said:
Look dumbass, enough of your drama and bad comprehension. All I did was give you the math conversion since you don't understand it. You can continue to make little sarcastic sidebars further showing your ignorance, which has been exposed today. It's fine with me. You can't freaking read, so you create your own drama. Your synapse aren't firing right kid. I said nothing about "telling a guy 28% to keep firing away". Said nothing about 28% being good, and said nothing about 42% being good.

Learn the game. And learn to read.
Click to expand...

i get the math conversion its stupid as hell, as i pointed out all these other players would be better than mcbee, is that what your conversion is trying to say? you try to make it sound ok that mcbee shoots 28% because thatd be 42% from 2 pt field goal, guess what thats not that good either. especially when the guy you guard is scoring about 60% of his fg.

you are clearly the one that needs to learn the game, if you cant tell that mcbee cant guard his own shadow, and cant throw a beach ball in an ocean then you have no room to talk about knowledge of the game.
 
#232
#232
GBO18 said:
Can we all agree that McBee is a below average player on an average team? It is not like he is getting minutes on a top 10 team.
Click to expand...

I'd say he's an average player on this team. It seems some people are hypercritical of Skylar. The OP states he should never see the floor. Coach Martin says he should. I'm going with Coach Martin.
 
#233
#233
bleedingTNorange said:
lets use your theory:

golden would be 52%
jordan mcrae 54%
cameron tatum 53%
renaldo woolridge 60%

clearly these 3 guys should start and take 10 3's minimum each. that is what your theory says right?
Click to expand...


It has nothing to do with specific players %'s and what they would be from 2land. Good gracious. It just gives you the % needed to shoot from 3land and 2land to get the same results.
If you shoot 100 3 pointers and make 28%, you get 84 points.
If you shoot 100 2 pointers to get to 84 pts, you make 42 of them, which is 42%. That's why 40% from 3 is very good. Because you have to shoot 60% from 2land to get the same point total.

I know this is way to much for you, but if you really focus, you might be able to understand it.
 
#234
#234
bigorange61 said:
I'd say he's an average player on this team. It seems some people are hypercritical of Skylar. The OP states he should never see the floor. Coach Martin says he should. I'm going with Coach Martin.
Click to expand...

True but if we had another decent guard, McBee wouldn't see the floor. I just think people are frustrated because we are not very good.
 
#235
#235
Spartacavolus said:
It has nothing to do with specific players %'s and what they would be from 2land. Good gracious. It just gives you the % needed to shoot from 3land and 2land to get the same results.
If you shoot 100 3 pointers and make 28%, you get 84 points.
If you shoot 100 2 pointers to get to 84 pts, you make 42 of them, which is 42%. That's why 40% from 3 is very good. Because you have to shoot 60% from 2land to get the same point total.

I know this is way to much for you, but if you really focus, you might be able to understand it.
Click to expand...

douchebag i get what you are saying you can quit with your dumbass equation, its actually very simple.

what im saying is what the hell is the point, what are you trying to prove with this mad man theory you have? that even though skylar shoots 28%, its not as bad as it really seems? is that what your trying to say here?
 
#236
#236
GBO18 said:
True but if we had another decent guard, McBee wouldn't see the floor. I just think people are frustrated because we are not very good.
Click to expand...

Bingo! he's playing the minutes he is for one reason and one reason only, WE HAVE NOBODY ELSE.
 
#237
#237
bleedingTNorange said:
i get the math conversion its stupid as hell, as i pointed out all these other players would be better than mcbee, is that what your conversion is trying to say? you try to make it sound ok that mcbee shoots 28% because thatd be 42% from 2 pt field goal, guess what thats not that good either. especially when the guy you guard is scoring about 60% of his fg.

you are clearly the one that needs to learn the game, if you cant tell that mcbee cant guard his own shadow, and cant throw a beach ball in an ocean then you have no room to talk about knowledge of the game.
Click to expand...


I learned that stupid as hell conversion after hearing Roy Williams speak about it a few years ago when he was still at Kansas. Thanks for continuing to show yourself to be an uninformed poster. Today has been a really embarrassing day for you.
Do you think I would just make up a point/shooting % analysis?
 
#239
#239
Spartacavolus said:
It has nothing to do with specific players %'s and what they would be from 2land. Good gracious. It just gives you the % needed to shoot from 3land and 2land to get the same results.
If you shoot 100 3 pointers and make 28%, you get 84 points.
If you shoot 100 2 pointers to get to 84 pts, you make 42 of them, which is 42%. That's why 40% from 3 is very good. Because you have to shoot 60% from 2land to get the same point total.

I know this is way to much for you, but if you really focus, you might be able to understand it.
Click to expand...

Pretty clear and interesting...nothing too complex. I thought Woolrich was on his way when he hit 5 in the first half against KY....but CM pulled did not let him go off in the second half, that might have been fun to watch.
 
#240
#240
football junkie said:
We seen him on the 2010 elite 8 team, great chance we see him next year too, like it or not.
Click to expand...

no man i heard he was running for some office in rutledge. They are renaming their courthouse after him one "brick" at a time. Due to scheduling conflicts, he will forgo his sr year and lead his ppl to the promise land.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#241
#241
Spartacavolus said:
I learned that stupid as hell conversion after hearing Roy Williams speak about it a few years ago when he was still at Kansas. Thanks for continuing to show yourself to be an uninformed poster. Today has been a really embarrassing day for you.
Do you think I would just make up a point/shooting % analysis?
Click to expand...

no but the fact a simple equation you are so damn proud of and go on and on about its really funny.

im still waiting for what the hell your point is with this theory? what are you trying to prove?
 
#242
#242
NEVolFan said:
Pretty clear and interesting...nothing too complex. I thought Woolrich was on his way when he hit 5 in the first half against KY....but CM pulled did not let him go off in the second half, that might have been fun to watch.
Click to expand...


Yes it is. And it's used in gameplans and with statistic guys within athletic programs. If a coach knows he has the shooters to hover around 40% from 3 and can launch, it gives his D some breathing room. For example, if the opponent isn't strong from 3, your D can allow over 50% from 2's and win comfortably if you are a 3 point shooting ball club. That's just a general explanation.

I've got 100's of pages of stuff I have written down over the years just from listening to coaches at summer clinics around the country. That's where I get my info. When someone calls me a dumbass, they are talking about Denny Crum, Gene Bartow, Rick Byrd, Don Meyer, etc.
 
#243
#243
Spartacavolus said:
Yes it is. And it's used in gameplans and with statistic guys within athletic programs. If a coach knows he has the shooters to hover around 40% from 3 and can launch, it gives his D some breathing room. For example, if the opponent isn't strong from 3, your D can allow over 50% from 2's and win comfortably if you are a 3 point shooting ball club. That's just a general explanation.

I've got 100's of pages of stuff I have written down over the years just from listening to coaches at summer clinics around the country. That's where I get my info. When someone calls me a dumbass, they are talking about Denny Crum, Gene Bartow, Rick Byrd, Don Meyer, etc.
Click to expand...

and mcbee cant do this moron

and im going to guarantee none of these coaches would call mcbee a good defender or a knockdown 3 point shooter right now. your ridiculous.

your infatuation with mcbee is scary, the following statements are true and how you can argue them i will never understand.

1. he is not a good 3 point shooter at this point
2. he is not a good shooter from 2
3. he is not a good ball handler
4. he is not good at creating offense
5. he is not good at rebounding
6. he does not take care of the ball
7. he is slow and cant guard his own man

if we had anybody else this guy would not be playing, further more if richardson was a little better offensively he'd be playing more. you may still see mcbees minutes dwindling with mcrae playing better and better, and ccm wanting to continue to play tatum.
 
Last edited:
#244
#244
bleedingTNorange said:
and mcbee cant do this moron

and im going to guarantee none of these coaches would call mcbee a good defender or a knockdown 3 point shooter right now. your ridiculous.

your infatuation with mcbee is scary, the following statements are true and how you can argue them i will never understand.

1. he is not a good 3 point shooter at this point
2. he is not a good shooter from 2
3. he is not a good ball handler
4. he is not good at creating offense
5. he is not good at rebounding
6. he does not take care of the ball
7. he is slow and cant guard his own man

if we had anybody else this guy would not be playing, further more if richardson was a little better offensively he'd be playing more. you may still see mcbees minutes dwindling with mcrae playing better and better, and ccm wanting to continue to play tatum.
Click to expand...

wow,this ia going to be fun but right now spartacus is looking through his 100 pages of notes for answers for 1-7
 
#245
#245
I leave VN to watch the super bowl and come back and spartacus is still doing his impersonation of skip bayless
 
#247
#247
Spartacavolus said:
No **** if we had better players skylar wouldn't be playing.

More genius tidbits from dumb and dumber.
Click to expand...

what wait why? i thought his blistering 28% was irreplaceable?

if you feel tht he wouldnt be playing then quit defending him. he must not be that good of a shooter or defender if even you admit that he wouldnt play if we had another guard. he's not a sec caliber player that is all any of us have said and you continue to want to argue that point and pull out newtons law to prove that 28% deserves PT. he cant defend his own shadow everyone here sees it, sorry it wasnt bad luck that ware scorched him and nobody else, but yet you want to go on rants as to why he's a good defender. the guy is not a sec caliber player, guess what we're a sec team, so on this team and going against the competition he does, he is terrible. his purpose is to do 1 thing and that is hit 3's and yet he cant even do that decently, he brings very little to this team and is more of a liability as proven by his +/-.
 
Last edited:
#248
#248
bleedingTNorange said:
what wait why? i thought his blistering 28% was irreplaceable?
Click to expand...


More made up bs from you. Nobody said that.


You are a drama queen with reading comprehension issues who lies and exaggerates to try to make a point. Add a little ocd and your necessity to have the last word in every thread, and you get quite a head case.

Good luck with that. I'm sure its working out well for you.
 
#250
#250
Spartacavolus said:
No **** if we had better players skylar wouldn't be playing.

More genius tidbits from dumb and dumber.
Click to expand...

whats funny last night I called you an idiot and you said I sunk to name calling and you spent most of the day name calling.looks to me you didnt take enough notes from crum,bartow etc..
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top