DeerPark12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,215
- Likes
- 11,545
Constructive??
Unfortunately, we have a legend with dementia it is sad...but why start calling for an AD's head when she "feels" forced out?
What is constructive about that?
But the second meeting didn't take place until after the NCAA tourny and he also lied to the press about what he had told Coach Summitt about retiring the Lady Vols logo. I don't believe him at all.
Because he has proven to be as dishonest as the past AD. He has lied over and over and that should not be someone who is heading the UT AD. Most of understood that Pat would probably not be back. It should have been her decision and then he lied over and over about what his plans were and what his statements were. It isn't about the fact that Pat had to step down, I believe she would have come to that decision. It is about Hart's dishonesty in how he is riding rough shod over the Women's program. And might I add letting people go from the only programs that have never had any NCAA sanctions and have always run a program with integrity; unlike the men's side of the dept.
She was done - we all know this - no reason to take it out on Hart. People are just looking for a scapegoat here when its the disease and her health that are the issues.
She. Could. Not. Come. Back. Full stop.
She wasn't coaching anymore. It's heartbreaking, but it's true. Her coaching career was already over.
No idea how this played out, but if Dave Hart had to step in and make sure that the right thing happened, then good for him. The right thing for both UT and Pat was for her to step down.
Pat said it seemed like she was being forced out but she didnt say in what words. I would guess that Hart discussed with her what was in her, the university's, and the athletes' best interest.
Summit is a legend, but it was the time for her to step down. It would have been terrible for this to have unfolded into a debacle