luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,839
- Likes
- 19,955
Greed is not good. We can pointlessly go around in circles, but it would only prove my point. Many in the US have been programmed to view greed as a positive.Yes. Greed is good.
You like to brag about your children’s accomplishments (rightfully so, I might add), but why did they accomplish things that made them financially successful? It is in no small measure because of instinctual greed. And greedy successful people accumulate resources that are used in many ways to assist and benefit those who are not as greedy and successful as they are.
Socialists are just as greedy. They simply chose a path to use the overwhelming power of the state against the individual to accumulate their power and wealth under the guise of helping others.
You're clueless. A CEO is supposed to work for a reasonable profit. It becomes greed when the desire for increased profit causes him to make decisions detrimental (harmful) to society, customers, employees.
I don't understand your first question.What if they only want that profit for their family? You told me that wasn’t greed.
And what’re ceos doing that is harmful to the groups you listed?
I don't understand your first question.
How tobacco companies marketed their product to kids and tried to hide the scientific data of its harm is a perfect example of when a desire for profit crosses over to greed.
I don't understand your first question.
How tobacco companies marketed their product to kids and tried to hide the scientific data of its harm is a perfect example of when a desire for profit crosses over to greed.
You define incentive as greed which is your mistake. Not all are motivated by money but removing the private sector from innovation and tech would absolutely hinder advancement in almost all areas. History showed that to be trueNot being at our current point may not be a bad thing.
Are there positive byproducts of greed - certainly.
But nowhere near all innovation and technological advancement was motivated by greed.
At what cost?
Wealth does not = quality of life. It's only one of multiple variables.
Disagree.Sure. You could argue hunter/gathers have a better quality of life I guess, but that's highly subjective and the wealth created by capitalism would even enable you to buy land and live as a hunter/gather if you wished.
The more capitalistic a country is, the wealthier the country and the better the people's lives are.