volfanbill
pack light and love heavy…
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 44,633
- Likes
- 31,662
Hard to argue against Ruth because of the pitching, but his numbers got a huge boost from hitting in front of Gehrig forever.Ruth would have probably been a Hall of Famer as a pitcher if he'd never picked up a bat. I know it's obvious and boring, but I don't see any way that he's not the greatest ever -- assuming, of course, that you believe that cross-era comparisons have any real validity, which they don't.
Pete Rose as a pure hitter. That's crazy talk. The guy was a .300 hundred hittin' slapper. If you want slap hitters, there are far better ones out there, ie Carew and Gwynn.As of right now i think Willie Mays is the best all around player ever (not my favorite that would be griffey jr.), but as a pure hitter i would say either ted williams or pete rose.
Pete Rose as a pure hitter. That's crazy talk. The guy was a .300 hundred hittin' slapper. If you want slap hitters, there are far better ones out there, ie Carew and Gwynn.
Rose wasn't ever the best hitter in the game while he was playing. In his youth, there were several better, in the middle, Brett was always better and late he was nothing but a singles wienie.
Any all around look that doesn't include Bonds, with his hitting, Gold Gloves, and base stealing is crazy.
Rose's hits record is nothing but pure at bats which speaks to longevity much more than hitting prowess.The fact that Rose has the hitting record qualifies him as a pure hitter and nobody said bonds wasn't one of the best all around players i just said i think mays is the best.
there is no doubt that some of the blind eye treatment was about the long ball filling seats.I am no fan of baseball. Just wanting to get your opinions.
Is it just me or has baseball sold it's soul to make up lost ground after the strike? It just seems like this whole debacle was allowed to happen simply because the sport needed to have some excitement and good story lines after the strike.
Rose's hits record is nothing but pure at bats which speaks to longevity much more than hitting prowess.
Fair enough on Mays, but I'd take Bonds on the all around any day, and I don't like Bonds, but do Mays.
I didn't say he wasn't a ballplayer. He was a competitor and was the heart of the Big Red Machine, but he was not one of the best hitters of all time, nor even close.I'm not a Bonds fan either, but if you're talking about the best all around players of all time, he has to top that list. As for Rose, I agree his record is due to longevity. However, the man was a flat out ball player. On that alone, he is in my top 15 of all time.
I'm not a Bonds fan either, but if you're talking about the best all around players of all time, he has to top that list. As for Rose, I agree his record is due to longevity. However, the man was a flat out ball player. On that alone, he is in my top 15 of all time.
I didn't say he wasn't a ballplayer. He was a competitor and was the heart of the Big Red Machine, but he was not one of the best hitters of all time, nor even close.
I forgot to mention he's now an overly loud, redneck, POS Don Quixote type who's mad at the powers that be in baseball because he was too stupid to avoid gambling on games in which he had a hand in the outcome.