Kingston Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,325
- Likes
- 28,819
If you believe this then you've just exposed how little you know about the subject
Get off the dude's back. He made a legit post and instead of arguing the merits or lack-thereof the post, people want to boost their internet/message board cred by bashing the spelling.
Get off the dude's back. He made a legit post and instead of arguing the merits or lack-thereof the post, people want to boost their internet/message board cred by bashing the spelling.
Get off the dude's back. He made a legit post and instead of arguing the merits or lack-thereof the post, people want to boost their internet/message board cred by bashing the spelling.
No they aren't. I'm not sure they'll get the job done at UT but they aren't unproven. Dooley was on Saban's staff when he was recruiting a NC team to LSU. Thompson and Chaney were on the last staff and have their own resumes. Chuck Smith's resume is just as impressive to young DL's as O's (alot more of them mention it as a factor). Baggett and Hiestand both have pro resumes that stand on their own.This staff is completely unproven. The last staff (except for the HC) was EXTREMELY proven in the college game not only as coaches, but outstanding recruiters (maybe not MK, but his name was enough).
I agree somewhat with this... OTOH, it is Aug 2nd. It is hardly the time to give up on the '11 class.That is the answer to this "why arent we getting big time players" debate. Its very simple. Proven coaches vs. un-proven. This staff will have to show what product they can produce on the field before the big-time guys seriously look our way. Its dumb to even argue over it. Anyone who expects, at this point in our program, after all that has happened, for 4 and 5* recruits to spurn offers from UF, UA, OSU, Texas etc. to come here are absolutely kidding themselves and being completely ignorant to the current state of our program.