ManningBerry#1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 3,982
- Likes
- 400
Just a reminder... Bruce Pearls first year of coaching. Look at that roster. Names I totally forgot about! And we made the dance.
I'm having a hard time believing CCM is a great coach/motivator. BP took underdogs into superstars. Dane Bradshaw?! Jordan Howell! ,
Just a reminder... Bruce Pearls first year of coaching. Look at that roster. Names I totally forgot about! And we made the dance.
I'm having a hard time believing CCM is a great coach/motivator. BP took underdogs into superstars. Dane Bradshaw?! Jordan Howell! ,
So you are saying that Stokes, Maymon, McRae, etc...are less efficient than Lofton? Or the same?
BP utilized Lofton. I'm not sure if CCM could have done the same.
What? BP wouldn't have had the success he did at UT if it were not for Lofton. It's not a very difficult concept to grasp.
I hate it when it becomes Bruce Pearl vs. Cuonzo but damn at least Bruce Pearl had proven himself and had a resume. Cuonzo had been an assistant for 8 years at ONE place, Purdue where he had played. Then he jumped into a head coaching spot at a solid mid major where 4 of his top 7 players during his 3rd year were from the previous coach, Barry Hinson. His best player had redshirted Hinson's last season. Pearl was a runner up and national champion at D2, made the NCAA tourney at UMW. He had some good talent that had been losers and made them believe. They were a very undersized group but played with heart and played up to their abilities. Pearl won big everywhere he had been so your argument has no merit.
You bring up good points. Thanks for your response. Pearl had great success while he coached in the NCAA's. But, by the time Pearl was fired at UT, he had already buried the UT basketball program into the ground and then some.
CM inherited a pretty decent roster and he's made the most of what he could with it. Pearl overachieved, but where has CM underachieved?
I'll reiterate your statement -> let's not compare the two, let's focus on who is here now.
I get optimism and all, but what on Earth has he done to deserve "a ton" of confidence?
You bring up good points. Thanks for your response. Pearl had great success while he coached in the NCAA's. But, by the time Pearl was fired at UT, he had already buried the UT basketball program into the ground and then some.
CM inherited a pretty decent roster and he's made the most of what he could with it. Pearl overachieved, but where has CM underachieved?
I'll reiterate your statement -> let's not compare the two, let's focus on who is here now.
To agree with what's been stated on this board many times, Chris Lofton would have produced great numbers his sophomore year whether or not BP was here or not. Pearl wouldn't have been at UT very long had it not been for Lofton IMO.
Buried it into the ground? He's the reason we have McRae and Maymon, the reason we had Golden, and a partial reason we currently have Stokes. He's a big reason that basketball has had a rejuvenated aura surrounding it for the past few years and why we're expected to make the tourney every year.
To even remotely suggest that Pearl ruined our program is biased and simply untrue.
And before all the anti-Pearl haters come out, I'll have to stipulate that Pearl wasn't a god nor is he Tennessee basketball. Yes, he made mistakes. Now that your terrible Straw-Man fallacies are out of the way, please do not invoke similar responses as is always done here.