So...because we asked to be patient with Dooley, we can't be patient with Butch Jones? Why is "we did the same thing with Dooley" being brought up as if it's some kind of burn? It WAS proper to be patient with Dooley, and his first year actually wasn't too bad. He did go on to show he couldn't cut it, but that doesn't mean we should have judged him right away.
So...because we asked to be patient with Dooley, we can't be patient with Butch Jones? Why is "we did the same thing with Dooley" being brought up as if it's some kind of burn? It WAS proper to be patient with Dooley, and his first year actually wasn't too bad. He did go on to show he couldn't cut it, but that doesn't mean we should have judged him right away.
Everyone plays a tough schedule. We don't really know how tough of a schedule we're playing is anyway, until the season ends and we see where teams finish up. But if you want to start that thread, feel free.
I've already said that I will tabulate the 4*s and 3*s on the teams Butch, Franklin, and Hugh Freeze started with in a new thread soon. Going back to the rosters on teams 9-10 years ago is more difficult because I don't know of an easy resource that has that info. But, I will look into including Spurrier's first team at South Carolina, if possible.
And yet, you're still here...
If you want to avoid any critical thinking regarding the coaching of UT football for a lengthy amount of time, may I suggest you just avoid the internet altogether?
There is a difference between asking for patience and asking for idiocy. Patience is waiting to beat the top teams in your conference and win a championship. Idiocy is not expecting any evidence of progress or anything but blowout losses to good teams. It was idiocy to think that Dooley deserved 3 years here before you could determine that he was a failure. And it is idiocy to assume that any future coach shouldn't be evaluated or should get another "year zero" before anyone expects any sign of progress.
You certainly appear to have the market cornered on idiocy. You post hyperbolic responses to arguments no one is making then tear them down with sarcastic generalizations. And all of your facts are deficient because they fail to provide a sufficient basis for accurate comparison. Yet, when that's pointed out, you complain that no one is addressing your facts, or you simply resort to the sarcastic ridicule. I hope you don't have a career which requires you to construct rational arguments about anything.
You talk about generalizations but yet you don't offer any concrete information to disprove anything I've said. You rely solely on subjective criticism and insults. And I'm sorry that the wins and losses of every other successful coach hired in the SEC in this century are insufficient to even offer a comparison to Butch Jones. Why don't you just tell me who we ought to be comparing him to? How far back do you need to go? What level of competition do we need to drop to for you to find a comparison you deem adequate for discussion?
In search of a factual basis in which to judge Butch Jones' first season, I thought we could look at the first years of coaches who were hired in the SEC in this century, who ultimately ended up being successful at their schools.
I noted their embarrassing losses (which I categorize as either a loss to an opponent with significantly less talent or a loss to an opponent where you just got thoroughly drubbed by a mass of points) and big wins (which I categorize as upsets over opponents with significantly higher rankings and/or talent, or an absolute drubbing of a respectable opponent with similar talent/ranking).
Mark Richt, Georgia
previous team record: 8-4
record in 1st year: 8-4
Bad Losses: None
Big/Upset Wins: Tennessee (#6 at home, W 26-24)
Urban Meyer, Florida
previous team record: 7-5
record in 1st year: 9-3
Bad Losses: Alabama (L 31-3), South Carolina (L 30-22)
Big/Upset Wins: Florida State (decisive win over ranked rival, W 34-7)
Nick Saban, LSU
previous team record: 3-8
record in 1st year: 8-4
Bad Losses: Florida (L 41-9)
Big/Upset Wins: Tennessee (#11, W 38-31)
Nick Saban, Alabama
previous team record: 6-6
record in 1st year: 7-6
Bad Losses: Louisiana Monroe (L 17-12)
Big/Upset Wins: Tennessee (decisive win over ranked rival, W 41-17)
Les Miles, LSU
previous team record: 9-3
record in 1st year: 11-2
Bad Losses: none
Big/Upset Wins: Miami (decisive win over top 10 team, W 40-3)
Gene Chizik, Auburn
previous team record: 5-7
record in 1st year: 8-5
Bad Losses: None
Big/Upset Wins: None
Bobby Petrino, Arkansas
previous team record: 8-5
record in 1st year: 5-7
Bad Losses: Alabama (L 49-14), Texas (L 52-10), Florida (L 38-7)
Big/Upset Wins: LSU (W 31-30)
Steve Spurrier, South Carolina
previous team record: 6-5
record in 1st year: 7-5
Bad Losses: Auburn (L 48-7)
Big/Upset Wins: Tennessee (W 16-15), Florida (W 30-22)
James Franklin, Vanderbilt
previous team record: 2-10
record in 1st year: 6-7
Bad Losses: Alabama (L 34-0)
Big/Upset Wins: Wake Forest (W 41-7), *also close losses to Tennessee, Florida, Arkansas & Georgia, (all within a touchdown) notable simply because they are Vanderbilt, after all
...So what can we learn here? What stands out to me is that the majority had at least one bad, uncompetitive loss in their first season. But also, everyone except Chizik had either a big upset win or a decisive blowout over a talented team (or, in the case of Vanderbilt, at least a comparably or arguably more talented rival). Several coaches took over teams with losing records and all made it to a bowl in their 1st year. Out of 9 instances, only 1 coach (Petrino) failed to show improvement in their first year in either win/loss record or in victories over ranked rivals. Petrino is also the only one of the 9 to lose more than 1 game in blowout fashion.
meaningless.
Were any hired as the 4th head coach in that program in 6 years? If not, the comparison is meaningless.
What attrition rates had their programs suffered in the 3 years previous to their hire??
no two programs are the same so what a first year coach does, does not mean someone else should duplicate that.
Good research but has little meaning to how Butch Jones will or will not do at Tennessee
Everyone plays a tough schedule. We don't really know how tough of a schedule we're playing is anyway, until the season ends and we see where teams finish up. But if you want to start that thread, feel free.
I've already said that I will tabulate the 4*s and 3*s on the teams Butch, Franklin, and Hugh Freeze started with in a new thread soon. Going back to the rosters on teams 9-10 years ago is more difficult because I don't know of an easy resource that has that info. But, I will look into including Spurrier's first team at South Carolina, if possible.
You just lost all (if any) credibility after the first sentence you typed. I am hoping that you are either really drunk or just had some sort of brain fart because if you really believe that statement then you truly are dumb.
Take UL for example. A lot of people are talking about Bridgewater right? Who does he play? According to you their schedule is tough and is on par with other teams in the top 10. That is absolute lunacy. You're another person who needs someone with some level of common sense to proof read your posts.
I'm not going to go back and research it, but I'm pretty sure the South Carolina team that Spurrier inherited had much lower recruiting rankings over the previous 4 years than UT has had. Ditto Saban's 1st LSU team. But of course we can't look at recruiting rankings or win/loss record or anything factual when making excuses for Butch.
Nope, it's the same as it was for Dooley. He inherited the worst situation ever in the history of football and we can't expect him to make any progress until his contract is up.
And if you're determined to bury your head in the sand or up the AD's a$$, that's cool. This thread was intended for people who like to use logic and facts and actually evaluate a coaching staff. If you don't believe in evaluations, go check out one of those "Open Letter to..." threads, instead.
You talk about generalizations but yet you don't offer any concrete information to disprove anything I've said. You rely solely on subjective criticism and insults.
And I'm sorry that the wins and losses of every other successful coach hired in the SEC in this century are insufficient to even offer a comparison to Butch Jones.
Why don't you just tell me who we ought to be comparing him to? How far back do you need to go? What level of competition do we need to drop to for you to find a comparison you deem adequate for discussion?