drylo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,567
- Likes
- 19,817
Actually, pretty sure Briles didn't play any of the guys after they were charged. And pretty sure any of the guys that did play were either cleared or the matter had just been dropped.
Pretty sure you're wrong...otherwise Briles would still be the coach. Whole crux of his dismissal was misconduct. If he handled things right as you posit, what would constitute the "misconduct"?
Actually, pretty sure Briles didn't play any of the guys after they were charged. And pretty sure any of the guys that did play were either cleared or the matter had just been dropped.
I understood Baylor players missed zero playing time.
As in zero disciplinary action.
Jones suspended every player with an accusation against him. Briles not only let his guys with accusations against them play. But accusers and accusers' families were discouraged from pursuing action/charges. There is no comparison.
My only issue is concluding Jones should be fired were it proved he called Bowles a traitor. Lots of things in the heat of the moment can be said, I personally could not cosign CBJ being terminated for that without a lot more detail of the verbal back and forth which took place.This sums it up pretty well....
The problem with comparing Tennessee and Baylorâs allegations â Swain Event
I laid the facts out above. Your statement isn't exactly true (though I think some players did not miss time after they were alleged to be involved in some kind of altercation/incident that didn't lead to any criminal charges).
This sums it up pretty well....
The problem with comparing Tennessee and Baylorâs allegations â Swain Event
What investigation is Seth Stokes talking about here? is it simply an internal review and when is it expected to be completed?
There is a federal investigation, just like at 200 some other schools. Its really nothing to worry over.
124 Colleges, 40 School Districts Under Investigation For Handling Of Sexual Assault
I laid the facts out above. Your statement isn't exactly true (though I think some players did not miss time after they were alleged to be involved in some kind of altercation/incident that didn't lead to any criminal charges).
I've scrolled back and forth through this thread and have still yet to come across these facts you say you laid out. So far all I can see is you saying something and calling it fact.....and then telling others to prove your facts wrong.
YOU HAVEN'T GIVEN ANY FACTS!!!
If I have somehow missed these allusive facts I apologize. Please re-post them with the links that verify what you are saying, because everything I'm reading says otherwise.
:hi:
They went the FSU route, let them play until they're behind bars. They also got in the way to keep it from becoming a criminal investigation. In every account CBJ suspended the player in question and allowed the KPD to work it out. Those are all facts, quit stirring the pot.*elusive
I'm on mobile and frankly don't care enough to go dig up a bunch of links. The facts are that nobody at Baylor played after being charged. I'm not clear on exactly what happened with guys that weren't charged (or before they were charged). Go look it up if you want to. Or just call me a troll like somebody else did. Either way, doesn't bother me.
*elusive
I'm on mobile and frankly don't care enough to go dig up a bunch of links. The facts are that nobody at Baylor played after being charged. I'm not clear on exactly what happened with guys that weren't charged (or before they were charged). Go look it up if you want to. Or just call me a troll like somebody else did. Either way, doesn't bother me.
They also got in the way to keep it from becoming a criminal investigation.
They went the FSU route, let them play until they're behind bars.
Butch Jones investigated and suspended players quickly (as the Tennenessean has proved, Jones was quickly making phone calls the following morning of one case / calling players + player parents/uncles, and those 2 players were immediately suspended within the week as I recall / what, in Nov 2014 was it ?).
Compare that, to the near 18-months that ESPN says Art Briles delayed his investigation:
"In 2013, the Waco Police Department wrote in a police report that it had informed Baylor officials about an off-campus incident involving former All-Big 12 tight end Tre'Von Armstead and former practice squad player Myke Chatman. Waco police also told the alleged victim they had contacted Baylor, but according to documents and interviews conducted by Outside the Lines, Baylor didn't begin looking into the allegations until Sept. 11, 2015.
Baylor kicked Armstead off its football team last fall (fall of 2015?) and expelled him from school in February (of 2016?) over the allegations, documents obtained by Outside the Lines show."
We're comparing disciplinary actions of Head Coaches (not alleged incidents, or final determinations of guilt by courts or other disciplinary boards) -- other info is still pending, but it's pretty clear Coach Jones took action against the accused players and Art Briles didn't (or, as is claimed, Art Briles took action to quiet the accusers). As far as I know, Butch Jones/his staff never contacted the accusers, only the players and the players' families.
Correct me if I'm mistaken.
Actually both are accusations as noted in the article. You have yet to provide anything to support what you are presenting as fact in your attempt to tip toe around comparing the baylor and ut situation.This makes no sense. The coaches can't prevent a police investigation. If it was reported to police, police investigated; if it wasn't, they didn't. That simple. Nothing to do with the coaches.
Not exactly, and not always. Charged =/= "behind bars." And some were suspended or booted even though they were never charged.