Franklin Pierce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2014
- Messages
- 26,894
- Likes
- 30,670
I doubt either one. I really don't know who it would be. If I understand the process correctly once Harris stepped down or is removed, Biden would nominate someone and the senate would confirm like a cabinet member. I think it would be a simple majority vote for confirmation.
Maybe Kasich? I kid but not really....
I'm not the one saying China has no sphere of influence outside the straits. They most definitely are positioning themselves all around the world. They are no longer a mass of backwater farmers.Yeah they do. That's called "playing catch up ball" as the great Ric Flair would say. How many pies do you think we have our fingers in?
Correct, but that doesn't mean they are a serious challenger to the United States as the leader of the global order either.I'm not the one saying China has no sphere of influence outside the straits. They most definitely are positioning themselves all around the world. They are no longer a mass of backwater farmers.
You think we would go to war over Taiwan? Talk about a huge cost in lives and treasure.
Meanwhile, the old Soviet Union, circa 1982 and their misadventure in Afghanistan, says hold my beer.
Hopefully out of this we will see Congress do more to assert its authority and not allow open-ended conflict this to go unexamined at the outset. Its fine to allow a POTUS a lot of discretion as to when to engage military action short of a formal declaration of war, especially in modern times when there is less traditional nation-state attack on us.
But the Congress should reasonably demand that whatever administration is calling those shots identify set goals that justify termination of hostilities. Otherwise it just goes on and on and at the very end we end up at best "tied" with whatever enemy there is because nobody articulated precise criteria to measure success.