tigervol9802
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 10,404
- Likes
- 6
They stand to lose millions in State funding.Won't matter. The legislature has influence, certainly, but they won't make or break any deal.
Interesting comments from Branch including It's the BOR responsibility to make sure it's good for the school, it's our responsibility to see it's good for the state. And it's our responsibility to see if it negatively impacts our state school, UT and Tech, as well as our private schools like Baylor. I'm pharaphrasing, but that's the general idea of his comments. Both Loftin and Byrne were asked to appear. It sounds like they could throw this thing into reverse.
Yeah if aggy still goes to the SEC it won't be because state officials think it's a good idea. There will be consequences for them going. Also interesting is the schools of the board members, most went to multiple school but none attended aggy.
BU-2
UT-2
Harvard-2
SMU-1
That's not much love for aggy on that committee
:no:House isnt in session again until 2013.
Althought it would be funny if a special session was called just to deal with this issue.
There won't ever be a called legislative session over this. But, there can and will be clear implications that "since the Ags are so rich and independent, I guess we can save a lot of state coin and cut their budgets severely".
Ball will be in the Ags court then. Do they want to go so bad they are willing to risk significant funding and a downgrade of the school or would they rather fall back in line and keep the money spigot from the taxpayers open. Their call. How much is leaving the state worth?
Too bad the football fans in the state of Florida disagree.
If teams were still travelling by train or bus the geography might matter.
Posted via VolNation MobileTexas lawmakers want to talk to A&M
The House Higher Education Committee has scheduled a hearing to take up the issue of Texas A&M's possible move to the SEC at 2 p.m. on Aug. 16.
Committee chairman Dan Branch, R-Dallas, also called a hearing last year when it appeared the Big 12 could break up with Texas and Texas Tech headed to the Pac-10 and Texas A&M headed to the SEC. But the Big 12 came together before the scheduled hearing.
Those being invited to the Aug. 16 hearing will include Texas A&M board of regents chairman, Richard Box, a dentist in Austin; and A&M president R. Bowen Loftin.
SEC commissioner Mike Slive will be invited, and members of the committee have indicated they'd like to know when discussions between Texas A&M and the SEC were initiated, and by whom, to determine if there may be any tortious interference with a contract between Texas A&M and the Big 12's television partners.
There's a chance Texas, Texas Tech and Baylor officials would be invited to talk about the potential fallout of an A&M departure. Questions for Texas would undoubtedly include the Longhorn Network, which has been a public concern for A&M officials.
"We want to be in position to have a discussion about a potential move to a new athletic conference for one of our major universities - that it's in the best interest of the state of Texas," Branch told Orangebloods.com.
"There's a lot of resources in play. These athletic programs have a lot of dollars involved with the TV contracts and the funding that comes from a particular conference. So we want to make sure if there was a decision to go a different direction at Texas A&M, it's the regents' job to make sure this is in the best interest of Texas A&M as one university in that system. And it's the Legislature's job to make sure it's in the best interest in the state of Texas."
I asked Branch if the committee found that such a move wasn't in the best interest of Texas, what could the Legislature do about it?
"Ultimately, these are public institutions," Branch said. "The Legislature is responsible for funding and directing the ultimate policy of our public institutions.
"So I think it's important that the Legislature be advised. And so I want to create an opportunity on a timely basis to give the members of the House of Representatives the opportunity to ask questions and make sure they felt like this was in the best interest of the state of Texas.
"There's an argument that going to the SEC would be a good thing so that Texas' biggest schools would have a footprint in two major conferences, so I'm going into this with an open mind. But it seems to me it's the regents' responsibility to do what's in the best interest of Texas A&M as the flagship of that system. And it's the Legislature's responsibility to make sure it's in the best interest of the state of Texas."
Branch said there are really two points of interest that are critical to the state's view of a possible move by Texas A&M to the SEC.
"Part of that goes to you don't want another major conference coming undone by the action of one," Branch said. "So there's two parts to this. One, is this a good move for Texas A&M?
"And, more importantly, from our vantage point would there be a negative consequence to the University of Texas or Texas Tech University and even our private schools like Baylor - what effect it could have on them?"
Stay tuned.
The A&M BoR is free to chose to leave if they wish. Big XII-II Commish Dan Beebe has stated that UofH is a viable candidate to replace the Ags and the Coogs will be happy to get the state funding that A&M walks away from.So likely this is al about to bel Texas legislature cock-blocked and the SEC will stay as is
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Would put one more Texas school into a BCS conference.If I remember correctly, UoH has been approved for future funds in order to bring them up to tier1 status. It would be awesome if some aggie funds were shifted to UoH.
If things come out that the legislature redirected/denied funding to A&M because they moved to the SEC, those dudes could be facing national PR suicide.
Or if it turns out that we initiated this and are subject to a Texas lawsuit for torting, that would likely also be a bit messy (doubt the sec did, but the legislature seems to possibly suspect such)
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I'm just saying we're not exactly adding another Vandy with them.
At this current moment I'd say their program is in better shape than ours, sadly.
I don't get why anyone is arguing about A&M's record. They don't need to come in and be world-beaters in order for the deal to work for everyone involved. What have Arkansas and USCe accomplished on the field since 1992? But is anyone going to argue that the SEC isn't stronger today than we were in '91?
Should tennessee leave for a weaker conference?That may be true that they are in better shape than Tennessee, but A&m is sadly mistaking if they think they can compete every year in the SEC. Should have gone to a weaker conference, with a little bit less $ instead of chasing the cash, and killing all title hopes.
Posted via VolNation Mobile