That's racist!

[headhunter15]

 

[508mikey]

Leaders ?

 

[KB5252]

She may be the most consistent, intellectually honest politician in America right now. As an American who doesn't have a party, neither represent me well, I could support this woman for the highest American offices.

 

[headhunter15]

She may be the most consistent, intellectually honest politician in America right now. As an American who doesn't have a party, neither represent me well, I could support this woman for the highest American offices.

I don’t agree with some of her social policies, but I agree. I could get behind her! She bodied Kamala Harris in the debate.

 

[allvol123]

Dammmnnnn! Jump on it Tulsi.

 

[utvolpj]

She may be the most consistent, intellectually honest politician in America right now. As an American who doesn't have a party, neither represent me well, I could support this woman for the highest American offices.

I don't agree with many of her positions but feel she's about the only one who would take the time to listen and consider alternatives.

 

[McDad]

She may be the most consistent, intellectually honest politician in America right now. As an American who doesn't have a party, neither represent me well, I could support this woman for the highest American offices.

I like her principles. I don't like her ideology...at least what has been shared here.

 

[KB5252]

I don't agree with many of her positions but feel she's about the only one who would take the time to listen and consider alternatives.

If feel the same, but all things considered I think she takes an authentic approach to decision making, not a knee jerk.

 

[hndog609]

I don't agree with many of her positions but feel she's about the only one who would take the time to listen and consider alternatives.

I'd agree I think Tulsi is intellectually honest. That doesn't mean I don't have issues with some of her stances but intellectual honesty is pretty hard to come by in modern politics.

 

[NCFisher]

She may be the most consistent, intellectually honest politician in America right now. As an American who doesn't have a party, neither represent me well, I could support this woman for the highest American offices.

I disagree and rather than make a duplicate post, refer you to my post under ‘Why Not Tulsi Gabbard’.

 

[NCFisher]

I don't know if Britain protects free speech; or if it protects speech equally.

They do not. The UK, Europe, and '1st World' Western nations generally have subsumed speech protections, such as they existed, to the service of protecting classes of people that, in government's opinion, require extra protection or immunity to "discrimination". It has resulted in 'hate speech' legislations entirely at odds with free speech.

In the U.S., it took the form of "hate crime" as the acclimation doorway to condition us to penalizing thought and emotion; that is what hate crime does. It's disgraceful and we see the outgrowth in various forms which attack property, free association, and right to conduct business and earn income without government, social policy persecution. College campuses have been incubators of speech-fascists for decades.

Before the Trump presidency and subsequent election of Biden, I'd thought we might be 40-50 years behind Europe; now, I'd be surprised if it's more than 10-20. Currently, the 1stA prevents congress from directly violating speech. But, just as Marxo-fascists have always done, they leverage industry and media to do it for them. Leftists politicians openly prod big tech, print, radio and televised media to outright censor conservatives or otherwise dissenting voices.

In socialist governed countries such as China, S. Union, Cuba, NK, etc. government simply destroyed or placed proletariat-spouting technocrats in those entities to run them. In fascist countries, private ownership could retain ownership by compliance; "everything within the state, nothing against the state, and nothing outside the state." The corporatist model - the smiley-face fascist model - is to...encourage censorious action and advocacy according to party and ideology. This is what we're seeing in the U.S. To the rather small degree that media aren't already acting as Praetorian guard for the left, and industry to protect market hegemony.

 

[volinbham]

I don't know if Britain protects free speech; or if it protects speech equally.

nope

Man guilty of hate crime for filming pug's 'Nazi salutes'

 

[508mikey]

16 shot, 2 fatally, in 12 shooting incidents across Chicago | WGN-TV nobody in custody the article states - Police reform is working in Chicago - right JB Ptritzker ?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

16 shot, 2 fatally, in 12 shooting incidents across Chicago | WGN-TV nobody in custody the article states - Police reform is working in Chicago - right JB Ptritzker ?

Crushing it!

 

[Orangeslice13]

I don't agree with many of her positions but feel she's about the only one who would take the time to listen and consider alternatives.

She has a history of compromise and working across the isles

 

[volbeast33]

I don't agree with many of her positions but feel she's about the only one who would take the time to listen and consider alternatives.

That is extremely rare in today’s times.

 

[Carl Pickens]

I don’t agree with some of her social policies, but I agree. I could get behind her! She bodied Kamala Harris in the debate.

Get behind her you say?

 

[Orangeburst]

They do not. The UK, Europe, and '1st World' Western nations generally have subsumed speech protections, such as they existed, to the service of protecting classes of people that, in government's opinion, require extra protection or immunity to "discrimination". It has resulted in 'hate speech' legislations entirely at odds with free speech.

In the U.S., it took the form of "hate crime" as the acclimation doorway to condition us to penalizing thought and emotion; that is what hate crime does. It's disgraceful and we see the outgrowth in various forms which attack property, free association, and right to conduct business and earn income without government, social policy persecution. College campuses have been incubators of speech-fascists for decades.

Before the Trump presidency and subsequent election of Biden, I'd thought we might be 40-50 years behind Europe; now, I'd be surprised if it's more than 10-20. Currently, the 1stA prevents congress from directly violating speech. But, just as Marxo-fascists have always done, they leverage industry and media to do it for them. Leftists politicians openly prod big tech, print, radio and televised media to outright censor conservatives or otherwise dissenting voices.

In socialist governed countries such as China, S. Union, Cuba, NK, etc. government simply destroyed or placed proletariat-spouting technocrats in those entities to run them. In fascist countries, private ownership could retain ownership by compliance; "everything within the state, nothing against the state, and nothing outside the state." The corporatist model - the smiley-face fascist model - is to...encourage censorious action and advocacy according to party and ideology. This is what we're seeing in the U.S. To the rather small degree that media aren't already acting as Praetorian guard for the left, and industry to protect market hegemony.

Man I appreciate your posts. Boiling the frog.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith says Tim Tebow NFL comeback is 'white privilege'

 

[Boca Vol]

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith says Tim Tebow NFL comeback is 'white privilege'

Anyone surprised?

 

[Boca Vol]

Minneapolis Police: 2 dead, 8 injured in downtown shooting

I'm 99% sure the shootout was among black men. The fact that 10 people were hit leaves a slight chance it wasn't.

 

[TheDeeble]

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith says Tim Tebow NFL comeback is 'white privilege'

The amount of butthurt over a TE that may not even make the roster is amazing.

 

[C-south]

Minneapolis Police: 2 dead, 8 injured in downtown shooting

I'm 99% sure the shootout was among black men. The fact that 10 people were hit leaves a slight chance it wasn't.

We’ll have to wait for Ktown to find out their race so he can determine if it’s a racist white domestic terrorist or a poor, mentally ill, oppressed, black person. He can do this one too:

Fort Wayne mass shooting leaves 1 dead, 4 injured

 

[NCFisher]

Man I appreciate your posts. Boiling the frog.

Thank you, kind of you to say.

Literally the only reason I post in political forums since the mid-90s is because I think conservatives have better positions, but often don’t argue them well. Most people lose debates due to bias or laziness; losers are often as intelligent but simply get outworked because they believe false things.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

ESPN's Stephen A. Smith says Tim Tebow NFL comeback is 'white privilege'

I don't watch Espn during the daytime because loud-mouth stupid idiots like Smith .... I have no time for.