Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,290
- Likes
- 61,882
Good Lord that's insulting.Looks like the leftists are saying that AAs and Latinos are inferior.
But this month, the California Supreme Court, which oversees the state bar, agreed to lower the passing score for the exam, a victory for law school deans who have long hoped the change would raise the number of Black and Latino people practicing law.
https://www.latimes.com/california/...ronavirus?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true
Now imagine what will happen when black lawyers are assigned to black defendants, and the whites get whites. And we still see the discrepancy in who goes to jail.Looks like the leftists are saying that AAs and Latinos are inferior.
But this month, the California Supreme Court, which oversees the state bar, agreed to lower the passing score for the exam, a victory for law school deans who have long hoped the change would raise the number of Black and Latino people practicing law.
https://www.latimes.com/california/...ronavirus?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true
Damn! I could’ve have told them that for free and without conducting a poll.
Americans Say Blacks More Racist Than Whites, Hispanics
Americans Say Blacks More Racist Than Whites, Hispanics, Asians
Crazy old 85 year olds who answer calls on a landline from strangers. Who woulda thunk it? lmao
Actual representative Americans don't take calls from people they know then answer a poll. Only super old people sitting at home answer these. lol
Lets not also look at the known unreliability of Rasmussen and the intentional miswording to make conservatives look better.
For example: "Given a choice between black lives matter and all lives matter, 44% of blacks – and 30% of all voters - say black lives matter more. "
BLM is nothing about mattering more, They intentionally misword questions.
This is pretty funny.
Well this brings up an interesting point: should White people be representing black defendants? If white people created the justice system as a way to oppress blacks, wouldn’t a white lawyer be doing everything they could to make sure you end up in jail? Should we assign lawyers based on the defendant’s race? Should a black defendant’s appeal based on ineffective black counsel be considered a hate crime?Now imagine what will happen when black lawyers are assigned to black defendants, and the whites get whites. And we still see the discrepancy in who goes to jail.
This is making the system more racist. Are you going to be able to reject a black lawyer on the basis of standards? Are they going to get paid less?
No. That's why "polls" should be taken with a boulder of salt.they're the only ones calling 85yos on land lines?
What bad decisions did B. Taylor make? She was at home sleeping in her bed when she had her door kicked in and got shot multiple times because law enforcement was looking for someone who had already been arrested. She was not harming or threatening anyone and was a RN working on the front lines of the pandemic. Her only crime was being black. We're not at risk because we're middle-class white guys. Please tell me what she did to deserve what happened to her. Can't wait for your answer.
No it doesn't.It happens to minorities to a proportionally larger degree than it does to caucasians.
Even if so (which I'm not conceding on your say so btw) are you suggesting white lives don't matter when it happens to them?
You had to go to the ku klux klan capital in some tiny Arkansas town to find people who are racist douche-nozzles. Kind of proving the point that racists are largely irrelevant. They aren't mainstream, and every reasonable American thinks those people are pieces of of cat sh*t.
Lets look at some empirical data -Any type of link to this?
Crazy old 85 year olds who answer calls on a landline from strangers. Who woulda thunk it? lmao
Actual representative Americans don't take calls from people they know then answer a poll. Only super old people sitting at home answer these. lol
Lets not also look at the known unreliability of Rasmussen and the intentional miswording to make conservatives look better.
For example: "Given a choice between black lives matter and all lives matter, 44% of blacks – and 30% of all voters - say black lives matter more. "
BLM is nothing about mattering more, They intentionally misword questions.
This is pretty funny.
EDIT: This is not my work but I agree with it.
No it doesn't.
Lets look at some empirical data -
We will be using three sources. One is a government source, the other two are far left sources just so leftists can't reject them.(I'd hate to use sources race baiting democrats don't find reputable)
Source 1: Table 43
Source 2: Here’s How Many People Police Killed in 2017
Source 3: The Data Is In: Police Disproportionately Killed Black People in 2017
All sources are about 2017.
Using just these sources, We disprove outright the claim that police disproportionately kill blacks. To do this, I am going to compare populations. I will not do the dishonest thing, and compare total populations. Rather, I will compare criminal populations. This is an important distinction, because it completely sidesteps dishonest arguments based on the per capita population, because no population is made entirely of criminals except the criminal population.
According to the FBI, the total number of arrests in 2017 was 8,162,849. According to The Root, the total number of people killed by the police in 2017 is 1,129. We are going to add those together to get a total attempted arrests, presuming that any incident that ended in death would have otherwise ended in arrest. This total is 8,163,978.
1129 is 0.0138290427% of 8163978, or ~0.014%. That is 14 in 100000. That puts your odds of surviving any arrest at ~99.986%.
According to the FBI, in 2017, blacks were arrested 2,221,697 times. According to DiversityInc, blacks made up 27% of people killed by police. Please note, they do not give a number, but a percentage. 27% of 1129 is 304.83, or ~305. Adding those deaths to the arrests, we get 2,222,002.
2222002 is 27.2171483069% of 8,163,978, or ~27%.
Please note the proportions. 2222002 is 27% of 8,163,978. 305 is 27% of 1129.
These numbers are proportional. Blacks are not being disproportionately killed by the police. 305 is 0.0137263603% of 2222002. Please recall that 1129 is 0.0138290427% of 8163978. Blacks are actually killed slightly less than the total percentage. But those percentages are both ~0.014%, or 14 in 100000. Black criminals have a nearly equal survival rate as the total survival rate. In fact, their chances are slightly better.
In conclusion: blacks made up ~27% of the total crime, and ~27% of the total death. The odds of surviving a police encounter were ~99.986% in total. The odds of surviving a police encounter were ~99.986% as a black person. It's time to stop letting people lie about this.
Also this https://archive.is/XLNh4
Then we can keep going with empirical data showing how of the officers that actually shoot people a higher % of the officers that shoot are black officers whether the victim is white or black.
EDIT: This is not my work but I agree with it.
No it doesn't.
Lets look at some empirical data -
We will be using three sources. One is a government source, the other two are far left sources just so leftists can't reject them.(I'd hate to use sources race baiting democrats don't find reputable)
Source 1: Table 43
Source 2: Here’s How Many People Police Killed in 2017
Source 3: The Data Is In: Police Disproportionately Killed Black People in 2017
All sources are about 2017.
Using just these sources, We disprove outright the claim that police disproportionately kill blacks. To do this, I am going to compare populations. I will not do the dishonest thing, and compare total populations. Rather, I will compare criminal populations. This is an important distinction, because it completely sidesteps dishonest arguments based on the per capita population, because no population is made entirely of criminals except the criminal population.
According to the FBI, the total number of arrests in 2017 was 8,162,849. According to The Root, the total number of people killed by the police in 2017 is 1,129. We are going to add those together to get a total attempted arrests, presuming that any incident that ended in death would have otherwise ended in arrest. This total is 8,163,978.
1129 is 0.0138290427% of 8163978, or ~0.014%. That is 14 in 100000. That puts your odds of surviving any arrest at ~99.986%.
According to the FBI, in 2017, blacks were arrested 2,221,697 times. According to DiversityInc, blacks made up 27% of people killed by police. Please note, they do not give a number, but a percentage. 27% of 1129 is 304.83, or ~305. Adding those deaths to the arrests, we get 2,222,002.
2222002 is 27.2171483069% of 8,163,978, or ~27%.
Please note the proportions. 2222002 is 27% of 8,163,978. 305 is 27% of 1129.
These numbers are proportional. Blacks are not being disproportionately killed by the police. 305 is 0.0137263603% of 2222002. Please recall that 1129 is 0.0138290427% of 8163978. Blacks are actually killed slightly less than the total percentage. But those percentages are both ~0.014%, or 14 in 100000. Black criminals have a nearly equal survival rate as the total survival rate. In fact, their chances are slightly better.
In conclusion: blacks made up ~27% of the total crime, and ~27% of the total death. The odds of surviving a police encounter were ~99.986% in total. The odds of surviving a police encounter were ~99.986% as a black person. It's time to stop letting people lie about this.
Also this https://archive.is/XLNh4
Then we can keep going with empirical data showing how of the officers that actually shoot people a higher % of the officers that shoot are black officers whether the victim is white or black.