Orangeslice13
RockyTop is back, Let’s Go!!
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 93,199
- Likes
- 106,284
To clarify, are you saying that even if the news is accurate and fair you will claim it to be garbage due to the source?I absolutely have a side: not dumpster diving in the back alleys of internet "news". Sure you may occasionally find a piece of filet mignon, but you still pulled it from a dumpster.
They throw out bear spray like it's more deadly than pepper spray its actually less concentrated
Sicknick's name keeps getting thrown out there like his death happened because of events of 1/6 when this has been clearly debunked. The whole 1/6 insurrection is a complete sham and everybody knows it.This must be an error. We’ve been assured that the current practices of DC corrections to keep all pretrial detainees in isolation 23 hours a day for in some cases over 400 days now is “normal procedure” and “can and does happen all the time”.
Sicknick's name keeps getting thrown out there like his death happened because of events of 1/6 when this has been clearly debunked. The whole 1/6 insurrection is a complete sham and everybody knows it.
I don't trust the govt enough to believe them sending someone to jail means much of anything. They could do it to anyone who doesn't have the resources
People are being convicted for simply being present. They are being hunted down online for that heinous crime. Yes there are those who should be locked up but the charges for most are nonsense and trumped up (pun intended)Evidence and procedure are still required. Not having resources isn't a .gov problem and could happen in any aspect of the legal system since it's always the government prosecuting matters.
I've stated it before, we have legal system - not a justice system. Either way, convictions are convictions - they aren't happening behind closed doors and without evidentiary support.
Have there been any estimates of the number of people who attended the rally versus the number rioting outside and the number who broke inside the capitol?People are being convicted for simply being present. They are being hunted down online for that heinous crime. Yes there are those who should be locked up but the charges for most are nonsense and trumped up (pun intended)
People are being convicted for simply being present. They are being hunted down online for that heinous crime. Yes there are those who should be locked up but the charges for most are nonsense and trumped up (pun intended)
I'm saying the "crime" is dubious at best and the number being targeted is ridiculous. But they make, enforce and convict so it's very convenient.Are you saying people are being convicted without evidence they committed a crime?
Being present (inside of a secured area) while seemingly innocuous is still illegal.
Are you saying people are being convicted without evidence they committed a crime?
Being present (inside of a secured area) while seemingly innocuous is still illegal.
They were members of the Weather Underground. Since 1969, the radical left group had already bombed several police targets, banks and courthouses around the country, acts they hoped would instigate an uprising against the government. Now two of these self-described revolutionaries wandered the halls with sticks of dynamite strapped under their clothing. They slipped into an unmarked marble-lined men’s bathroom one floor below the Senate chamber. They hooked up a fuse attached to a stopwatch and stuffed the device behind a 5-foot-high wall.
When the Left Attacked the Capitol
View attachment 386155
How many of these people were convicted and locked up for being present in a secure area?