The Biden/Harris Administration Accomplishments Thread

But it has zero bearing on today, other than we’ve progressed as society. Who people eliminated and why 100 years ago means nothing today. As I said in another post, you want to right a wrong by doing the exact same thing. That’s dumb Luther. Do you teach that to your students? One kid gets caught cheating on a test so do you now let everyone else cheat too? Surely even you can see the flaws in that thinking.
Of course it still has bearing today.
I think if a student is caught cheating, they should receive a zero and their previous grades immediately become suspect. What would be asinine and unfair to all other students would be to let the cheating kid keep the grade they made while cheating. If they were going to be allowed to keep the grade made while cheating, of course I would encourage all students to cheat, because that would be a ridiculous and unfair system in which we would be asking them to operate.
If you are going to allow the cheater to keep their grade (unfair advantage), another option that would help level the field is to give everyone who did not cheat a 50 point bonus on their next test.
There must be punitive consequences for the cheater or the ones who were adversely impacted will still suffer.
If you are not going to have punitive consequences for the cheater, then the other option is to give advantages to everyone but the cheater.
What you are advocating is no punitive consequences for the cheater and also no advantages to the ones who did not cheat.
 
Of course it still has bearing today.
I think if a student is caught cheating, they should receive a zero and their previous grades immediately become suspect. What would be asinine and unfair to all other students would be to let the cheating kid keep the grade they made while cheating. If they were going to be allowed to keep the grade made while cheating, of course I would encourage all students to cheat, because that would be a ridiculous and unfair system in which we would be asking them to operate.
If you are going to allow the cheater to keep their grade (unfair advantage), another option that would help level the field is to give everyone who did not cheat a 50 point bonus on their next test.
There must be punitive consequences for the cheater or the ones who were adversely impacted will still suffer.
If you are not going to have punitive consequences for the cheater, then the other option is to give advantages to everyone but the cheater.
What you are advocating is no punitive consequences for the cheater and also no advantages to the ones who did not cheat.
But the people who “cheated” are dead or at least out of Washington, except for Biden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
One doesn't get to cheat for an extended period of time and then say "okay, no more cheating from anyone - everything is equal from this point forward."
The cheater will face punitive consequences and concessions will be made to those adversely effected by the cheating.
Only then can there be a chance of anything resembling equal opportunity.
Biden did it in the name of equal opportunity.
😂
 
One doesn't get to cheat for an extended period of time and then say "okay, no more cheating from anyone - everything is equal from this point forward."
The cheater will face punitive consequences and concessions will be made to those adversely effected by the cheating.
Only then can there be a chance of anything resembling equal opportunity.
Biden did it in the name of equal opportunity.

Guess that Amateur thread will get ignored until we have about 4 or 5 more pages so you can act like you didn't see anything. Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and AM64
But it has zero bearing on today, other than we’ve progressed as society. Who people eliminated and why 100 years ago means nothing today. As I said in another post, you want to right a wrong by doing the exact same thing. That’s dumb Luther. Do you teach that to your students? One kid gets caught cheating on a test so do you now let everyone else cheat too? Surely even you can see the flaws in that thinking.

Very good ethical questions.
 
Hey genius, if that was happening the whole time then yes it’s wrong. We know it was back in the 60s and prior and I agree it was wrong but even then people weren’t dumb enough to come out and say it publicly. Your idiot president did just that in a time where everyone talks about equal opportunity when they really mean something totally different.

Unfortunately we don't seem to be picking presidential and vice presidential candidates any better in "open" primaries than when the parties basically selected them. You might even think it's gotten worse; which doesn't look good for the future - especially if you think that the clowns the biden administration is attracting might be in the running one day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
My list is a list of the VPs who lost.
We all know the VPs who won were all white males until Harris.
My point was that women and people of color were eliminated from consideration immediately. They were removed from the pool of "most qualified" simply because of their sex or race. We all know that that is true and most all know that that was wrong.

White men "cheated" for centuries. Many now want to simply say, okay no more cheating by anybody.
That like a baseball team is caught in the 140th game of the season to have been cheating the whole season. They currently have a 25 game lead over the second place team. The cheating team says, okay we want cheat any more but you can't take away our lead. Every other team is screaming "how in the hell is that fair, we can never catch them."
Or in college football, the team caught cheating can't just say they want cheat anymore. They will be disadvantaged by losing scholarships over the next several seasons. Their unfair advantage gained from cheating will be partially negated by the disadvantage of having fewer scholarships - which is also an increased advantage for their competitors.
It's the whole "balancing the playing field" concept.
Lmao you are insane. No wonder you aren’t taken seriously.
 
Guess that Amateur thread will get ignored until we have about 4 or 5 more pages so you can act like you didn't see anything. Lol.
“I’ve never heard of antifa” - Luther
“I never heard of VA governor blackface- Luther
“I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Always the same pattern
 
“I’ve never heard of antifa” - Luther
“I never heard of VA governor blackface- Luther
“I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Always the same pattern
I had no idea what Antifa was when I said I had no idea what Antifa was. I quickly realized it was pretty much nothing but a right wing boogey man meant to scare the right.

I don't remember anything about any VA governor blackface comments. But whatever I said was the truth.

You show me where Abrams said the votes were rigged.......this is the one I'm really interested in.
Find a quote, it should be easy.
 
Last edited:

lol....
She didn't say votes were rigged.

Please, read Rickyvoll's dig at me ... “I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Has Abrams ever said the votes were rigged? So far you are 0 for 2.
Maybe Ricyvoll wants to change his knock against me that you and a couple of other nuts were so quick to jump in on.

Abrams' claim was always and still is VOTER SUPRESSION......not that VOTES WERE RIGGED.
Most thinking people recognize the difference.
 
Last edited:
lol....
She didn't say votes were rigged.

Please, read Rickyvoll's dig at me ... “I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Has Abrams ever said the votes were rigged? So far you are 0 for 2.
Maybe Ricyvoll wants to change his knock against me that you and a couple of other nuts were so quick to jump in on.

Abrams' claim was always and still is VOTER SUPRESSION......not that VOTES WERE RIGGED.
Most thinking people recognize the difference.
A distinction without a difference.
She straight up said the election was rigged.


This is why nobody actually takes you seriously.


A 2 time business failure who cried in his daughters arms when trump was elected and now makes a living off of other peoples taxes.


as you were
 
A distinction without a difference.
She straight up said the election was rigged.


This is why nobody actually takes you seriously.


A 2 time business failure who cried in his daughters arms when trump was elected and now makes a living off of other peoples taxes.


as you were
wow......You are continuously wrong on so many levels.
It's a difference with a huge distinction - both in Abrams' claims and in this specific debate.
Ricky wants to make some pointless and inaccurate dig at me and other nuts ignorantly pile on.
Not a single one of you would ever be able to find a post from me denying that Abrams disputed the results and fairness of the election.
So you were 0 for 2. Give up and go find another game.
 
wow......You are continuously wrong on so many levels.
It's a difference with a huge distinction - both in Abrams' claims and in this specific debate.
Ricky wants to make some pointless and inaccurate dig at me and other nuts ignorantly pile on.
Not a single one of you would ever be able to find a post from me denying that Abrams disputed the results and fairness of the election.
So you were 0 for 2. Give up and go find another game.
DDD92FAD-0490-4C2B-A188-F758AD0F4705.gif
 
lol....
She didn't say votes were rigged.

Please, read Rickyvoll's dig at me ... “I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Has Abrams ever said the votes were rigged? So far you are 0 for 2.
Maybe Ricyvoll wants to change his knock against me that you and a couple of other nuts were so quick to jump in on.

Abrams' claim was always and still is VOTER SUPRESSION......not that VOTES WERE RIGGED.
Most thinking people recognize the difference.
lol....
She didn't say votes were rigged.

Please, read Rickyvoll's dig at me ... “I’ve never heard that Abrams said the votes were rigged” - Luther

Has Abrams ever said the votes were rigged? So far you are 0 for 2.
Maybe Ricyvoll wants to change his knock against me that you and a couple of other nuts were so quick to jump in on.

Abrams' claim was always and still is VOTER SUPRESSION......not that VOTES WERE RIGGED.
Most thinking people recognize the difference.
1:05 to 1:30 she explains what she means by "rigged".
 
1:05 to 1:30 she explains what she means by "rigged".
She was directly asked if she thought the "election" was rigged. She said the game was rigged. Still not saying votes were rigged.
But I will conceded that she used the term "rigged" in her response when asked about rigging.
And again, I never once denied she claimed the election was unfair due to voter suppression.
So, to the degree that voter suppression = rigging the vote, she circuitously claimed votes were rigged.
 
Last edited:
She was directly asked if she thought the "election" was rigged. She said the game was rigged. Still not saying votes were rigged.
But I will conceded that she used the term "rigged" in her response when asked about rigging.
And again, I never once denied she claimed the election was unfair due to voter suppression.
So, to the degree that voter suppression = rigging the vote, she circuitously claimed votes were rigged.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13

VN Store



Back
Top