C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 27,077
- Likes
- 48,374
I'm not sure "mediocrity" is necessarily the best way to express your thought but I think your premise is sound.
Imagine if you had a mechanic that didn't choose the best tool for the job based on the actual merit but rather wanted to be sure to be more inclusive of other tools. Like say a ratchet would absolutely be the better choice but that seems discriminatory (the ratchets get used a lot) he feels he should "level the playing field" by using some pliers. Would you consider this guy a good mechanic?
If the pliers (or screwdriver, or crescent wrench, whatever) are the right tool for the job then fine. Even the concept that the right tool for the job is supposed to be predicated on some degree of fairness in usage is f'ing ridiculous.
I have a golf buddy like that. He’ll sometimes pick club based on whether he’s hit it that day or not.
Mediocrity isn’t always in play but when you set out to hire based on diversity you’re admitting you’re willing to accept less than the best even if it isn’t always a given.