clarksvol00
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
- Messages
- 8,004
- Likes
- 5,183
No clue what you're saying. Do you think there should be special incentives to spur economic growth. Yes or no? That's what his was, that's what Trump's tax abatement s were, that why South Carolina paid for BMW's sewage/water infrastructure and gave them a pass.on property taxes.Why would it be unwound? Are you saying other companies shouldn’t get these opportunities? Just particular ones?
Nobody else has Trump's deal. Nobody else has BMW's deal. Nobody else has Ford's deal. Nobody else has Nissan's deal. They're all different.
Think about what you're saying... What if SC went in and said, we dint like BMW, were backing out of whatever deal we had with them? Those deals involve tax abatements and other concessions that last decades.You are saying only Disney’s is being unwound. Considering they are the only one with that deal, how could anyone else’s be undone. They are the only one that has it.
Think about what you're saying... What if SC went in and said, we dint like BMW, were backing out of whatever deal we had with them? Those deals involve tax abatements and other concessions that last decades.
Backing out would assume there was an arrangement where there was agreed to termination date and then you ended it prior to that date.
If the Florida legislation wants to open this type of deal for any company, I’m all for it.
Otherwise, Disney had a deal no one else in Florida had access to. I’m ok with it being terminated.
Backing out would assume there was an arrangement where there was agreed to termination date and then you ended it prior to that date.
If the Florida legislation wants to open this type of deal for any company, I’m all for it.
Otherwise, Disney had a deal no one else in Florida had access to. I’m ok with it being terminated.
Whatever you say Chief. Nissan had a deal nobody else in TN had access to decades ago. If TN had gone after Nissan, they wouldn't be bringing in the businesses they are now and have for the last few years. Cut your nose off to spite your face all you want.
And what do you think the ramifications will be and how will it benefit Florida?
Agreed. I would think the main result would be higher prices at Disney, which would effect folks visiting from out of state more than FloridiansI think it will neither benefit nor harm Florida.
Disney isn’t moving. Disney will likely pay more taxes and the same services that were performed previously by Reed, will now be performed by the county at a more expensive and less efficient rate.
Hypothetical numbers: If I offer 20k per employee in moving expenses to Nissan employees who relocate to TN and the company expects to create an additional 1000 jobs in addition to those numbers, do i get the same economic benefit by extending the same offer John's Transmission and Exhaust, who expects to create an additional 4 jobs?If they create jobs why would you want them restricted?
What burden? They're funding the burden now, this will turn it over to the counties. Disney currently maintains it's own roads, provides it own power, wastewater treatment. Orange county would be responsible for this starting in 2023. It appears they'd also have to assume the $1 bil in debts that Reedy Creek currently has.
Hypothetical numbers: If I offer 20k per employee in moving expenses to Nissan employees who relocate to TN and the company expects to create an additional 1000 jobs in addition to those numbers, do i get the same economic benefit by extending the same offer John's Transmission and Exhaust, who expects to create an additional 4 jobs?
Edit: what if I say the 3 year construction of Nissan hq will employee a thousand more and produce even more revenue while John's Transmission will be leasing an existing garage.
Why are you so certain John’s won’t grow into a national chain with headquarters where they started, employing another 250 people?
Analysis: DeSantis vs. Disney: Homophobia and hate are beneath the surface of high-minded, right-wing talking points - CNN
Homophobia and hate are right underneath the surface of the high-minded talking points about "parental rights in education."
Can you bring 80,000 jobs to the state? If so then you probably can.
Reedy Creek, signed into law by a Republican governor, supported by conservatives for half a century suddenly makes no sense. Strange the sudden turn of events.
I'm curious what numbers have been laid out in terms of economic benefit to the state? I swear I can't find the data they've provided anywhere.