The Impeachment Thread

#36,526
#36,526
volfanhill said:
There’s no rule against it. I was stating that it’s stupid to do so with regard to the attorney. The attorney is paid to defend his client. What his actual beliefs are not relevant to his job.
Click to expand...
That is not what you had said. And I disagree that it's a stupid thing to do. If you can show that a defense attorney doesn't really believe in his own argument... you should show it.
 
#36,530
#36,530
luthervol said:
I give the removal of Trump about a 2% chance of happening. Not because he isn't guilty and deserving of removal, but because of the repub. Senators' and horde of red hatters desire to bury the truth and blindly support Trump.
There is not a sane person to be found that doesn't truly believe that Trump withheld funds for personal gain. And the vast majority of that vast majority know that it represents an abuse of power that rises well above the threshold of impeachability.
Click to expand...

Would not surprise me if he did it either, but, it doesn't rise to the level of impeachment. Censureship maybe, but not impeachment. If roles were reversed and this was a Democrat, no way would you believe it rises to impeachment. Hell, you don't believe perjury reaches impeachment level, no way this does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, tbwhhs, volinbham and 2 others
#36,532
#36,532
evillawyer said:
Think the point to where you guys have fallen. You attack a purple heart recipient, but get all giddy when Trump pardons war criminals.
Click to expand...
lmao Both sides do what's politically expedient. You might as well cut the bull ****. Both sides SHOULD be ashamed but neither side is. There are no morals in politics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, volinbham and StarRaider
#36,535
#36,535
For the left, the real question isn't whether or not Trump did what he was accused of. The real question is rather it rises to the level of impeachment established by the U.S. Constitution. As much as you really want it to, it doesn't do that. The Democrats are trying to turn impeachment into a political tool. That should not be allowed. If it is, we're going to see more instances of a House controlled by a party in opposition to the President using it as such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40
#36,536
#36,536
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, tbwhhs, AM64 and 5 others
#36,537
#36,537
Weezer said:
For the left, the real question isn't whether or not Trump did what he was accused of. The real question is rather it rises to the level of impeachment established by the U.S. Constitution. As much as you really want it to, it doesn't do that. The Democrats are trying to turn impeachment into a political tool. That should not be allowed. If it is, we're going to see more instances of a House controlled by a party in opposition to the President using it as such.
Click to expand...

Retroactive impeachments.... Adam Schift could be appointment Chief Impeached and preside over all impeachments
 
#36,538
#36,538
volinbham said:
speaking of things Schiff has done that are corrupt - he not only knew of FISA problems and denied them, continually claimed to have evidence of collusion that he never had or produced. Boy that last one sounds familiar.
Click to expand...

Carter Page is about to get paid $$$$$
 
#36,540
#36,540
vols40 said:
Is it just me or are there some highly unattractive members making the arguments on the house managers team. Wow
Click to expand...

the choice of managers is interesting. I get Schiff since he was in charge. Nadler because it's his committee but I bet they wish they could get someone else. Jeffries and Lofgren must have muscled their way on. Surely their are better litigators among the D-House
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#36,543
#36,543
volinbham said:
the choice of managers is interesting. I get Schiff since he was in charge. Nadler because it's his committee but I bet they wish they could get someone else. Jeffries and Lofgren must have muscled their way on. Surely their are better litigators among the D-House
Click to expand...
Dims wanted diversity. A black dude, a white dude, a white Humpty Dumpty dude, and an angry woman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
#36,544
#36,544
Weezer said:
lmao Both sides do what's politically expedient. You might as well cut the bull ****. Both sides SHOULD be ashamed but neither side is. There are no morals in politics.
Click to expand...

There are no moral saints in politics. But there are certainly degrees of moral depravity. And the Trump enablers are dominating there. Neither side being perfect does not entail both are morally equivalent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main
#36,547
#36,547
Weezer said:
For the left, the real question isn't whether or not Trump did what he was accused of. The real question is rather it rises to the level of impeachment established by the U.S. Constitution. As much as you really want it to, it doesn't do that. The Democrats are trying to turn impeachment into a political tool. That should not be allowed. If it is, we're going to see more instances of a House controlled by a party in opposition to the President using it as such.
Click to expand...
It certainly rises to the level of impeachment.
The moral of the Trumpism catastrophe is, don't elect a horrendously despicable human as president. If you do, the bar for impeachment will be as low as we can legally set it. Elect a descent and honorable human, and the bar for impeachment will be as high as legally possible.
 
#36,549
#36,549
evillawyer said:
Are the Trump knuckle-draggers on here proud of Ms. Blackburn?

Click to expand...

How patriotic was it of Donald Trump to side with Russia over the conclusions of our intelligence community, including his own Director of National Intelligence in Helsinki in July of 2018? Lt. Col. Vindman is a Purple Heart recipient. That is more than can be said for either Blackburn or Cadet Bone Spurs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top