The Impeachment Thread

[hUTch2002]

We've already established you're delusional, so of course that's how you see it. Your mind creates some really weird fantasies.

He probably thought today was a good day for the Dems. It definitely was not.

 

[DynaLo]

Hard to impeach someone when your ex-congressional ass is sitting home because voters are sick of your tantrums and voted you all out.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

That ain't right.

 

[StarRaider]

That ain't right.

Nancy and Schummer's luvchild.

 

[RockyTop85]

For a party that constantly complains about how triggered the left gets (he'll, Don Jr used "Triggered" as the title of the book he had someone write under his name), the GOP seems to be rather irascible.

Well, it is now a party whose leaders seem to disproportionately pick fights with women and children.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Nancy and Schummer's luvchild.

It's something for sure that's not of this world.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[hjeagle1vol]

Can't wait!

 

[evillawyer]

Well, it is now a party whose leaders seem to disproportionately pick fights with women and children.

Those b*tches and rugrats had it comin'

 

[evillawyer]

Democrats are having a field day after Trump's lawyers accidentally made the strongest case to call witnesses in his impeachment trial

 

[Orange defense]

View attachment 256572

 

[Orange_Crush]

Those b*tches and rugrats had it comin'

 

[hjeagle1vol]

The Fabulous 4 with all that discovery material could resolve the entire case.

 

[Orange defense]

View attachment 256578

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:CRWD) Director Sells $256,785,000.00 in Stock
And then this. Trump’s tweet was from today, matching this in 2018. It’s happening folks.

 

[AM64]

I have never been able to hear him talking about Guam tipping over without laughing , and wondering how a grown man can even think that, much less let it come out in the open .

I wonder if he knows they flew B-52 missions over Vietnam from Guam. Those are pretty heavy - especially when there are lots of them. If it went like the missions from Okinawa, they were accompanied by tankers - those are pretty heavy, too. I can't even say I felt a little tremor when I saw planes come and go on Guam.

 

[BigOrangeD]

The Criminal DIMs got owned. Even the Liberal MSM admits it.

 

[AM64]

I so want one of the President's lawyers next week to say..

"You want to see a real Quid pro Quo? " then they play this vid..

The dims may actually have heard somewhere, and in their fuzzy little minds absorbed "The best defense is a good offense." I'm pretty sure that's been the name of the tune they've been playing all along. The flip side is that if they call attention to their plants, like the ambassador and a few others, it makes it look both vengeful and a CYA move if Trump takes action against them - poison pill strategy. They can still make a few smart moves from the dim/communist/politico-terrorist playbook even if those in the middle of the curve have the IQ of tepid water.

 

[volfanhill]

Democrats are having a field day after Trump's lawyers accidentally made the strongest case to call witnesses in his impeachment trial

I made that comment earlier. Pretty stupid of his legal team. It’s begging the GOP senators, who are the fence about witnesses, to vote for them.

 

[AM64]

Yes the house should have called them. The senate isn’t required to. But it is quite comical for Trumps lawyers to complain about witnesses. Especially since you know, their client, is the only reason we don’t. And I don’t blame him bc I would play it the same way.

I don't think Trump's lawyers are playing with an empty hand. You argue against witnesses - apparently because you don't want what the dems have lined up. That's Option A - no more witnesses - the house blew it. Option B is you give in ... with the proviso you also bring in witnesses - the ones the dims absolutely don't want anybody to hear from. That either calls the dim bluff, or it gets really interesting from here out.

 

[volfanhill]

I don't think Trump's lawyers are playing with an empty hand. You argue against witnesses - apparently because you don't want what the dems have lined up. That's Option A - no more witnesses - the house blew it. Option B is you give in ... with the proviso you also bring in witnesses - the ones the dims absolutely don't want anybody to hear from. That either calls the dim bluff, or it gets really interesting from here out.

Testimony about others wrong doings wouldn’t impact testimony of Trumps wrong doings. That’s not how it works.

 

[AM64]

I made that comment earlier. Pretty stupid of his legal team. It’s begging the GOP senators, who are the fence about witnesses, to vote for them.

Or a setup.

 

[Orange defense]

Q is destroying everything ii it’s path. Just don’t know who he is, but everything that is posed by him, tells us the truth. It comes to light every time.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Testimony about others wrong doings wouldn’t impact testimony of Trumps wrong doings. That’s not how it works.

It’s relevant to the allegations......it could get real ugly real quick. I’ll all for it. Let’s air out all the corruption. I’m thinking the Democrats would be more worried about it than trump. Either way let’s do this

 

[volfanhill]

Or a setup.

Lol. Yea so they will show the video of Bidens comments that every moron on here keeps posting. Then the Dems roll out EVERY single government officials opinion that that prosecutor was a scumbag and it’s why he was bounced. These opinions existed well before this scandal. We’re reported on. This was Biden trying to re-live a Corn POP moment. Is it absurd his son got that job? Of course. Now apply that to Trumps admin.