I would gladly trade the Bidens, the whistleblower, Schiff, Pelosi and Alexandra Chalupa as witnesses in order to get John Bolton followed by Mike Pompeo, William Barr, Mick Mulvaney, Rudy Giuliani and Devin Nunes.I'm not sure if the Democrats really want witnesses. You have the Senator candidates who need to be freed up. Plus Bolton's book is going to come out and make it look like a cover up (which will be a candidate talking point, no doubt).
I haven't seen anything that looks like something other than a politically motivated smear... and who is reporting these things? Anyone reputable? Not as far as I can tell. And yes, it's hearsay - which you don't want to believe when it is about Trump.
I can't help but laugh at where that interview is taking place. It's on Fox News, who made John Bolton a paid contributor for the entirety of Obama's 8 years in office. Bolton literally appeared on every show which was on the Fox News Channel during those years.... but suddenly, he isn't credible in their estimation? That is going to be a hard sell for that network.
Also, if Bolton is so bad, why did Trump handpick him to be National Security Adviser? At what point is Trump accountable for these supposedly bad personnel choices? How did someone like John Bolton get so much power? That is easy. Fox News had him on as a regular paid contributor and that is where the President gets his news. Trump gave him that power.
We need to know why schiff wouldn’t allow any R witnesses and say as too cowardly to go to court on the others.I would gladly trade the Bidens, the whistleblower, Schiff, Pelosi and Alexandra Chalupa as witnesses in order to get John Bolton followed by Mike Pompeo, William Barr, Mick Mulvaney, Rudy Giuliani and Devin Nunes.
Then let's get him to testify and explain why he rejected the House Republican's witness list and why he didn't want to try and compel witness testimony in federal court. I'm not sure either answer will help Trump but if it gets Bolton, Pompeo, Barr, Mulvaney and Nunes to testify? I say HELL YEAH.We need to know why schiff wouldn’t allow any R witnesses and say as too cowardly to go to court on the others.
...after the whistleblower's complaint had already been filed and the attempts to keep it from Congress had failed. Why didn't the White House hand over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress within two weeks as required by law? They knew it looked bad.You will not get an answer to that. Besides it doesn't matter. The fact is no investigation took place and the aid was released before the September 30 deadline.
...after the whistleblower's complaint had already been filed and the attempts to keep it from Congress had failed. Why didn't the White House hand over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress within two weeks as required by law? They knew it looked bad.
...after the whistleblower's complaint had already been filed and the attempts to keep it from Congress had failed. Why didn't the White House hand over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress within two weeks as required by law? They knew it looked bad.