The Impeachment Thread

#39,928
#39,928
Velo Vol said:
Hmm, why would we want to protect a whistleblower? What a novel question that no one has ever answered before.
Click to expand...

And we're NOT protecting the whistleblowers' communications. We're protecting his identity. To the extent his communications are being protected it's to ensure his identity is not deduced from them.
 
#39,930
#39,930
vols40 said:
Defacing the most famous office in the United States with a girl not that much older than his daughter? I get the Rush hate he is responsible for the demise of the 💯 of information being reported as gossip for the Democrats.
Click to expand...
LOL....In my honest opinion, Trump does more on a daily basis to deface the office than did Clinton with that scandal.
Not sure what you're saying about Rush, but he is a Charlatan rivaled only by Hannity. I've always questioned their audience.
 
#39,932
#39,932
evillawyer said:
And we're NOT protecting the whistleblowers' communications. We're protecting his identity. To the extent his communications are being protected it's to ensure his identity is not deduced from them.
Click to expand...

Which inherently raises questions. It is not acceptable for anyone, real or imaginary, to provide an anonymous deposition/file a complaint to damage a political foe. It reeks of corruption, and smells like bullsh!t. If this supposed whistleblower has the goods, then have the nads to lay it out in-person and in public view.

Guess what? He doesn’t have the goods, and it is more likely a figment of Schiff’s imagination.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#39,934
#39,934
Girth Brooks said:
Which inherently raises questions. It is not acceptable for anyone, real or imaginary, to provide an anonymous deposition/file a complaint to damage a political foe. It reeks of corruption and smells like bullish!t. If this supposed whistleblower has the goods, then have the nads to lay it out in-person.

Guess what? He doesn’t have the goods, and it is more likely a figment of Schiff’s imagination.
Click to expand...
??????? Everything has been substantiated and validated.
 
#39,935
#39,935
luthervol said:
??????? Everything has been substantiated and validated.
Click to expand...

No, it hasn’t.

How about we report you to the Hall County School Board for gross stupidity? Should we be protected while you’re investigated and fired? I’d find it funny because you would deserve it (if you’re as dumb in real life as you are on here, parents should be outraged that you’re allowed within 100 miles of a school), but you’d want the whistleblower to vouch for his complaint.

Let’s see you spin this on one of your BS continuums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, StarRaider and C-south
#39,937
#39,937
VolnJC said:
Translation: "Why can't everyone be woke and smart like us and hate the Orange Man?"
Click to expand...

Trump has taken their joke away about being orange and laughs at himself. That just chaps his enemies craw.

And I'm a little surprised that orange offends so many liberals on this board. If they were UK fans they would say the Vols have ugly or prison orange. Yep, orange is laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, StarRaider and VolnJC
#39,938
#39,938
luthervol said:
LOL....In my honest opinion, Trump does more on a daily basis to deface the office than did Clinton with that scandal.
Not sure what you're saying about Rush, but he is a Charlatan rivaled only by Hannity. I've always questioned their audience.
Click to expand...

Something against the largest audiences?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#39,939
#39,939
evillawyer said:
And we're NOT protecting the whistleblowers' communications. We're protecting his identity. To the extent his communications are being protected it's to ensure his identity is not deduced from them.
Click to expand...

Cross examination would be preferred even in a closed session.
 
#39,940
#39,940
Girth Brooks said:
Which inherently raises questions. It is not acceptable for anyone, real or imaginary, to provide an anonymous deposition/file a complaint to damage a political foe. It reeks of corruption and smells like bullish!t. If this supposed whistleblower has the goods, then have the nads to lay it out in-person.

Guess what? He doesn’t have the goods, and it is more likely a figment of Schiff’s imagination.
Click to expand...

Not the nads
 
#39,944
#39,944
evillawyer said:
And we're NOT protecting the whistleblowers' communications. We're protecting his identity. To the extent his communications are being protected it's to ensure his identity is not deduced from them.
Click to expand...

That's horse crap. He is a CIA hack. He can handle it. But why won't Schift release the transcript of the ICIG?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolnJC
#39,950
#39,950
Just part of the classic American tradition of defense counsel paying off the jury. Good stuff. MAGA! Jimmy Hoffa wishes it had been this easy for him.

 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top