BreatheUT
I see that pretty girl swag.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2017
- Messages
- 30,021
- Likes
- 40,810
Funny; I said angry, and you immediately assumed conservative. Interesting subconscious slip.
I can't stand of them. My family life improved significantly within weeks of shutting off cable. The only time I see any of those bloated bloviators from any of the money making media networks is if I'm stuck somewhere I can't change the channel.
How does one disprove an opinion exactly? He doesn't believe Fox anchors are angry. If I show him a clip of Bill O, Lou Dobbs, or any other Faux News toolbag getting angry on air (of which there are countless examples), I'll be met with some denial, deflection, or personal attack. Why would I bother debating with this audience. I might as well go to my fence and trade barks with my neighbor's dog.Feel free to disprove his assertion
How does one disprove an opinion exactly? He doesn't believe Fox anchors are angry. If I show him a clip of Bill O, Lou Dobbs, or any other Faux News toolbag getting angry on air (of which there are countless examples), I'll be met with some denial, deflection, or personal attack. Why would I bother debating with this audience. I might as well go to my fence and trade barks with my neighbor's dog.
How does one disprove an opinion exactly? He doesn't believe Fox anchors are angry. If I show him a clip of Bill O, Lou Dobbs, or any other Faux News toolbag getting angry on air (of which there are countless examples), I'll be met with some denial, deflection, or personal attack. Why would I bother debating with this audience. I might as well go to my fence and trade barks with my neighbor's dog.
I do not hate to see it. It's clear that Mittens is not conservative. So he can change party today if he likes. It's clear that he has a problem being a loser for president and is working against President Trump. Move his Senate desk to the other side of the room. But he won't because his state is SOLIDLY RED!
Kind of like a political "The Purge"?
We could certainly all take a step back and catch our breath for a moment, but the door has to remain open - I'm sure there is more evidence of additional wrongdoings in the pipeline.
Who said I was leaving? I find this forum amusing. Like slow fat white man pickup basketball. And since you're likely 20 years my elder, you can save yourself the trouble of linking me a glossary to urban dictionary. When you inevitably drop a Gunsmoke reference on me, then feel free to cue me to the reference. I'm glad you just discovered Friday but that reference has been around since the Clinton administration is ubiquitous.Bye Felicia >>>>> Urban Dictionary: bye felicia
I'll give you Bill O'Reilly. Hes about the only one though. Most of the younger fox personalities are pretty calm compared to the hysterical people on MSNBCHow does one disprove an opinion exactly? He doesn't believe Fox anchors are angry. If I show him a clip of Bill O, Lou Dobbs, or any other Faux News toolbag getting angry on air (of which there are countless examples), I'll be met with some denial, deflection, or personal attack. Why would I bother debating with this audience. I might as well go to my fence and trade barks with my neighbor's dog.
I'm aware that all things do not trace back to Trump; Trump is just as likely to be the culmination as he is the initiate.The trend of becoming more political started before Trump. They've yet to realize most people don't give a **** about their political views. Late night is for laughs and getting relaxed before sleep. Not about getting worked up over what has basically become a political rally. But of course, you can't resist that urge to make it about Trump. Your obsession with the man is unhealthy, and it saddens me how you let it so completely cloud your vision. You need to realize everything does not trace back to Trump.