tvolsfan
VN GURU
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 39,610
- Likes
- 12,743
Yeah it seems bizarre to me that we’re all supposed to believe outing this guy is a good faith attempt by the elected republicans to promote fairness and due process when we’ve seen the substance of the complaint confirmed by other fact witnesses and the republicans allegedly didn’t bother to show up to ask them questions.Whistle is blown. Doesn’t matter who blew it anymore. Deflect away.
Not to mention we now have actual testimony to go on. The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point.Yeah it seems bizarre to me that we’re all supposed to believe outing this guy is a good faith attempt by the elected republicans to promote fairness and due process when we’ve seen the substance of the complaint confirmed by other fact witnesses and the republicans allegedly didn’t bother to show up to ask them questions.
Meanwhile, it’s being hinted that the guy’s lawyer, who is even less relevant than he is, is a pedophile because he’s a Disney fanatic.
Absolutely. Smear the guy all you want, it doesn’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.Not to mention we now have actual testimony to go on. The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point.
Yeah it seems bizarre to me that we’re all supposed to believe outing this guy is a good faith attempt by the elected republicans to promote fairness and due process when we’ve seen the substance of the complaint confirmed by other fact witnesses and the republicans allegedly didn’t bother to show up to ask them questions.
Meanwhile, it’s being hinted that the guy’s lawyer, who is even less relevant than he is, is a pedophile because he’s a Disney fanatic.
That, plus muddying the waters for his deep state conspiracy. And possibly for revenge.Absolutely. Smear the guy all you want, it doesn’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.
All it does is discourage other whistleblowers from coming forward in the future. Which, of course, is the real point. Or at least part of it.
And many of us on here also said when quid pro quo failed the Dems would move the goalposts. Now look where we are.Numerous of us have been saying that on this forum the entire time. “No quid pro quo” was the manufactured republican defense before it crumbled. Now they’re resorting to incompetence.
Maybe I missed that. What is the crime again?What Mueller gathered and shared should have been more than enough to move Americans even on the republican side. What was clearly underestimated was the amount of Trump supporters who are just completely incapable of free thinking. The really sad truth of the problem is that Trump has now not only committed a crime in dealing with Ukraine but he confessed to it on camera right there on the White House lawn. Trump's chief of staff then got on camera and admitted to committing the crime. You basically don't even need the whistleblower at this point. The idiot committed a crime and confessed to it and you and the rest of the slow folks are in here arguing about it like it didn't happen. THAT is what is sad.
Absolutely. Smear the guy all you want, it doesn’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.
All it does is discourage other whistleblowers from coming forward in the future. Which, of course, is the real point. Or at least part of it.
"I had concerns that there was an effort to initiate politically motivated prosecutions that were injurious to the rule of law, both in Ukraine and the U.S.,"
"He (Trump) wanted nothing less than President Zelensky to go to a microphone and say investigations, Biden, and Clinton."
And many of us on here also said when quid pro quo failed the Dems would move the goalposts. Now look where we are.