hUTch2002
Wait til next year!
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2018
- Messages
- 18,296
- Likes
- 20,935
Still, Gordon Sondland was a major Trump donor and fund raiser during the 2016 presidential campaign. That is how he got his ambassadorship to the European Union. That makes it hard to dismiss him as having an anti-Trump bias. Isn't the most likely scenario here, that Sondland was at first lying to cover for Trump, but then, after being cornered by the testimony of others, he amended his own testimony and came clean? Gordon Sondland was definitely not a "never Trumper".I know what updated meant and that’s why I laughed , he said one thing then changed it . Just like that .... there went his credibility.
Still, Gordon Sondland was a major Trump donor and fund raiser during the 2016 presidential campaign. That is how he got his ambassadorship to the European Union. That makes it hard to dismiss him as having an anti-Trump bias. Isn't the most likely scenario here, that Sondland was at first lying to cover for Trump, but then, after being cornered by the testimony of others, he amended his own testimony and came clean? Gordon Sondland was definitely not a "never Trumper".
So when my client denies that he and his friends committed a robbery, and then later confesses, I should tell a jury that he doesn’t have any credibility left because two contradictory statements proves he lied to the police?I know what updated meant and that’s why I laughed , he said one thing then changed it . Just like that .... there went his credibility.
So when my client denies that he and his friends committed a robbery, and then later confesses, I should tell a jury that he doesn’t have any credibility left because two contradictory statements proves he lied to the police?
I’ve... never tried that before. What have I been missing out on?
Right, because the stakes aren’t high enough for a guy facing time in prison.